Meeting notes - 17th March 2022 virtual meeting
Date: 17th March 2022
Participants: aparcar, blocktrron, hauke, NeoRaider, pepe2k, lynxis, lach1012, rsalvaterra, wigyori, ynezz, daniel, mkresin
OpenWrt Member Meeting 2022/03
Next Release
- Collect what's missing for the next release: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/9248
- Branching on Sunday, 20. March (Hauke)
- everyone was fine with this
- RC1 date? (Hauke)
- About 1 week after branching
- buildbot setup (Hauke)
- ynezz will setup build bot for the release, Paul will support
- Branch name (Hauke)
- Date of the final release not really known, branch date is known at branch time
- ideas:
- only use the year
- keep 22.XX and change it at the release
- We decided on 22.03 as the branch name and the final version number is 22.03.0
- We do naming like before in 21.02 and 19.07
Upgrade Dnsmasq to 2.87 (Paul)
- Work on GitHub: dnsmasq: update to 2.87test8+ https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/4977
- dnsmasq 2.87 has nftables support instead of ipset
- ldir does not have time to take care of this, currently not well supported
- rsalvaterra will test it
Missing firewall4 features
- What features are missing and what bugs are open?
- multiport matches is missing
- rsalvaterra will send a mail to the mailing list for help
Miscellaneous
Various topics to be discussed
- GitHub related: (pepe2k)
- Labels for GH issues (e.g. “not a bug”, “regression”, etc.)?
- currently issues and pull requests share the labels
- assigning “not a bug” to a pull request is not useful
- we want to use labels for issues too, if more labels are needed for issues, they should be added to github
- Should we do anything about the way Github treats pushes from our git server (commiter is “Jo”), which in case of using “fixes: ...” tags in commit description, results in something like: “@jow- closed this in openwrt/openwrt@aae7af4 24 days ago”, see: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/issues/9243
- Currently the issues are pushed by jow's account to github
- Paul will replace it with the openwrt-bot github account
Automatic LAN Subnet Reassignment (Rich)
An RFC was created, please read the email blew https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/2022-February/002217.html
- Not very common in network devices, could confuse users
- Will be shifted to later
Do we have a guideline for handling PRs for contributors? (Hauke)
- Do we already have a wiki page? Should we promote it better?
- Example questions / tips:
- Reviews of none committers also help and also if someone else tested it and this is documented.
- What to do if the original author abandoned it?
- We do not have such a page
- We have a pull request template, but none for issues
- github suggest to look at contributing.md we could add such a file
- We can put device support into separate repository
- Yocto has the meta layers, but often the vendor meta layers are only compatible with a specific (old) Yocto version
- Maybe ship own boot loader for all boards and drop the rest
Prepare agenda/notes for next meeting at the end of ongoing one?
Create pad with next agenda directly in the previous meeting
Voting via the forum?
- Should we vote in the forum to have more people follow the discussion? openwrt-adm is very limited reading the audience
- We need a mail when there is a vote or anything else in the admin group in the forum.
- There is a mock vote, Paul send a mail
- Copy the results to the wiki to have redundancy
- It should be transparent, everyone should be able to see how votes
Next meeting in about one month on 12. April, Paul sends an invite.
Switch to other conferencing system
- often some people do not hear anyone from the start, reconnecting very often helps sometimes
- Only happens in bigger meetings (more than 5 people)
- Looks like it is a problem with this Jitsi