Show pagesourceOld revisionsBacklinksBack to top × Table of Contents Meeting notes - 14th February 2022 virtual meeting next release stop providing images for devices with known problems in WiFi driver OpenWrt v21.02.2 and v19.07.9 minor release planned for 15. Feb. (Hauke) OpenWrt event in 2022 (Hauke) (Held over from January meeting): How do we decide what goes into the "base release"? (richb) What happened to the Infrastructure Meeting? (Paul) Fuzzing of UBUS Meeting notes - 14th February 2022 virtual meeting Date: 14th February 2022 Participants: pepe2k, Hauke, rsalvaterra, lach1012, jow, tmomas, rmilecki, stintel, Paul, Kaloz, Daniel, wigyori, blocktrron, Adrian, lynxis, John, richb-hanover next release firewall4 overall looks good some minor problems problems with packaging iptables-nft kernel 5.10 bcm63xx not on kernel 5.10 Paul and Hauke discuss later 5.4 vs. 5.10 on imx6/cortexa9 USB broken (someone reported issue with Hummingboard2 Gate) → not confirmed yet not blocking will be checked on a wandboard broken 802.11s on MT7622 and MT7915E Paul will ask Felix directly and tries again DSA for ipq40xx? (https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/4721) open question: is there a performance regression? does the ipq40xx dsa survive 20gib without locking up? Any feature missing? (Hauke) Anything missing for a RC1? nothing missing Possible to branch off in 1 week and have a RC1 in 2 weeks? (Hauke) I would like to have a RC1 soon after branching off Not branch now, but make everything stable a bit now prevent backporting a lot of stuff do feature freeze on master no big changes, like new subsystems, build system changes freeze on ~1. March branch off on ~20. March Paul creates issue with a list of branch blocking topics, should be extended by everyone Hauke send mail with plan stop providing images for devices with known problems in WiFi driver e.g. mt7613 (mt7613 or mt7603?), qca ac wave1 Marvell wifi mt7620/rt2x00 alternatively flag them + produce warning on login via SSH or LuCI it is possible to have this in LuCI, but having there a database could be problematic can we query it from the driver? Extend upstream kernel drivers with quirks like it is done for PCI and USB devices get changes also upstream Previously we shipped them also. Would affect a lot of devices Sometimes also problems with broken clients (e.g. Old Intel wifi drivers) Wiki is preferred The table of hardware has links to the wifi driver, e.g. https://openwrt.org/docs/techref/driver.wlan/mt76 → all those driver pages need to be filled / reviewed by someone knowledgeable. Any volunteers? WPA3 not working on some devices, probably mostly driver and FW problem OpenWrt v21.02.2 and v19.07.9 minor release planned for 15. Feb. (Hauke) Waiting for 21.02 LuCI backports form Jo wolfssl update for 19.07 Any other blockers? wolfssl problem: accessing it early causes “no cipher overlap” error message could be an entropy problem OpenWrt event in 2022 (Hauke) Options: Colocate with Wireless Battle Mesh still looking for a place and date Colocate with Open Source Summit Europe (Linux Con, embedded Linux conference) September 13 – 16, 2022, Dublin Some prefer Wireless Battle Mesh COVID-19 could be a problem we will not really organize something, but endorse it have a side meeting there (Held over from January meeting): How do we decide what goes into the "base release"? (richb) Suppose someone proposes a new feature/new way of working. (Obviously, it has to provide benefit/value to a broad set of people, and not be insecure/dangerous/etc.) What process do we use to make the decision? I have two examples where the conversation evolved/could evolve into a discussion of the merits of the proposal, instead of what decision process we use for inclusion. An example: Someone on the forum wanted to extend OpenWrt announce a mDNS name, but only if it gets into the default. technical probably easy by adding umdnsd Process: Make an RFC and describe it in detail on the mailing list. Having a working prototype will makes it more likely to get response. What happened to the Infrastructure Meeting? (Paul) There are some kickoff mails, but nothing more happened yet We like this idea SFC took over Digital Ocean payment using our account hosting for git, forum, wiki… is the expensive part Move to OSUOSL as an option it would be free, digital ocean is pretty expensive SFC suggested this lynxis will ask Hetzner for sponsoring Fuzzing of UBUS makes sense static code analyzing is also useful we have already Coverity: https://scan.coverity.com/projects/openwrt (just use “add me to project” and someone will approve) We have fuzzing integrated for libubox already ynezz did this some time ago Paul wants to integrate with Google fuzzer project automation is easier when it is on github compared to our own infrastructure Next meeting in about 4 weeks. This website uses cookies. By using the website, you agree with storing cookies on your computer. Also you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Privacy Policy. If you do not agree leave the website.OKMore information about cookies Last modified: 2022/02/20 17:44by hauke