Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
playground:richb:rules-rc3 [2020/12/01 17:35] – Tweak wording/order richb-hanoverplayground:richb:rules-rc3 [2020/12/01 18:11] richb-hanover
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 //Third draft of revised OpenWrt Rules - These update the [[:rules|Current OpenWrt Rules page]] when ratified //Third draft of revised OpenWrt Rules - These update the [[:rules|Current OpenWrt Rules page]] when ratified
-([[:playground:richb:rules|RC2]] was a false start, and has been replaced by Adrian’s and Rich’s suggestions toward a minimal set of changes to the original set of rules -Rich Brown 1Dec2020)//+([[:playground:richb:rules|RC2]] was a false start. These rules reflect Adrian’s and Rich’s suggestions toward a minimal set of changes to the original set of rules-Rich Brown 1Dec2020)//
  
   - The OpenWrt project is governed by a group of //decision makers,// who have demonstrated a strong commitment to OpenWrt, through high quality contributions of code, documentation, organization and/or leadership. The current list of decision makers is appended to this page.   - The OpenWrt project is governed by a group of //decision makers,// who have demonstrated a strong commitment to OpenWrt, through high quality contributions of code, documentation, organization and/or leadership. The current list of decision makers is appended to this page.
   - All decision makers have the right to vote and are invited to liberally exercise this voting right in order to keep a broad consensus on project matters.    - All decision makers have the right to vote and are invited to liberally exercise this voting right in order to keep a broad consensus on project matters. 
-  - A formal proposal to vote shall follow this process: A brief description of the proposal must be moved and seconded on the OpenWrt-Adm list. A discussion ensues, and after the discussion has settled, any decision maker may call the question and request a vote on a final draft of the proposal, specifying how long the vote will be held open.+  - A formal proposal to vote shall follow this process: A brief description of the proposal must be moved and seconded on the OpenWrt-Adm list. After any discussion has settled, any decision maker may call the questionrequest a vote on a final draft of the proposal, and specify how long the vote will be held open.
   - Votes for decision maker membership, overall development directions, and other project matters are decided by simple majority votes of active decision makers. Changes to these rules require a two-thirds majority of active decision makers.    - Votes for decision maker membership, overall development directions, and other project matters are decided by simple majority votes of active decision makers. Changes to these rules require a two-thirds majority of active decision makers. 
   - Decision makers who are unreachable for three months in a row shall have their status revoked in order to retain the ability to have binding votes among the remaining active decision makers.   - Decision makers who are unreachable for three months in a row shall have their status revoked in order to retain the ability to have binding votes among the remaining active decision makers.
Line 13: Line 13:
   - Any votes and decisions made will be made public on the project websites.   - Any votes and decisions made will be made public on the project websites.
   - Project infrastructure should be outsourced FOSS community operated services whenever possible in order to allow project members to focus on actual development efforts.   - Project infrastructure should be outsourced FOSS community operated services whenever possible in order to allow project members to focus on actual development efforts.
-  - Any infrastructure that cannot be outsourced and/or is operated by the project itself shall be administrable by at least three different people to reduce the likelihood of the project getting locked out due to operators being unreachable. Responsible operators for the various services shall be documented publicly.+  - Each infrastructure service requires at least three different people with full rights to administer it. Responsible operators for the various services shall be documented publicly.
   - The project will not offer email accounts under its project domain for privacy and equality reasons.   - The project will not offer email accounts under its project domain for privacy and equality reasons.
   - Be nice to each other.   - Be nice to each other.
  • Last modified: 2022/09/08 13:21
  • by richb-hanover