Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| playground:richb:rules-rc3 [2020/12/01 17:35] – Tweak wording/order richb-hanover | playground:richb:rules-rc3 [2020/12/01 18:11] – richb-hanover | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| //Third draft of revised OpenWrt Rules - These update the [[: | //Third draft of revised OpenWrt Rules - These update the [[: | ||
| - | ([[: | + | ([[: |
| - The OpenWrt project is governed by a group of //decision makers,// who have demonstrated a strong commitment to OpenWrt, through high quality contributions of code, documentation, | - The OpenWrt project is governed by a group of //decision makers,// who have demonstrated a strong commitment to OpenWrt, through high quality contributions of code, documentation, | ||
| - All decision makers have the right to vote and are invited to liberally exercise this voting right in order to keep a broad consensus on project matters. | - All decision makers have the right to vote and are invited to liberally exercise this voting right in order to keep a broad consensus on project matters. | ||
| - | - A formal proposal to vote shall follow this process: A brief description of the proposal must be moved and seconded on the OpenWrt-Adm list. A discussion ensues, and after the discussion has settled, any decision maker may call the question | + | - A formal proposal to vote shall follow this process: A brief description of the proposal must be moved and seconded on the OpenWrt-Adm list. After any discussion has settled, any decision maker may call the question, request a vote on a final draft of the proposal, |
| - Votes for decision maker membership, overall development directions, and other project matters are decided by simple majority votes of active decision makers. Changes to these rules require a two-thirds majority of active decision makers. | - Votes for decision maker membership, overall development directions, and other project matters are decided by simple majority votes of active decision makers. Changes to these rules require a two-thirds majority of active decision makers. | ||
| - Decision makers who are unreachable for three months in a row shall have their status revoked in order to retain the ability to have binding votes among the remaining active decision makers. | - Decision makers who are unreachable for three months in a row shall have their status revoked in order to retain the ability to have binding votes among the remaining active decision makers. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| - Any votes and decisions made will be made public on the project websites. | - Any votes and decisions made will be made public on the project websites. | ||
| - Project infrastructure should be outsourced FOSS community operated services whenever possible in order to allow project members to focus on actual development efforts. | - Project infrastructure should be outsourced FOSS community operated services whenever possible in order to allow project members to focus on actual development efforts. | ||
| - | - Any infrastructure | + | - Each infrastructure |
| - The project will not offer email accounts under its project domain for privacy and equality reasons. | - The project will not offer email accounts under its project domain for privacy and equality reasons. | ||
| - Be nice to each other. | - Be nice to each other. | ||