This is an old revision of the document!
netifd (Network Interface Daemon) – Technical Reference
- netifd is available in OpenWrt since R28499 (trunk) and published under the GPLv2.
What is netifd?
netifd is an RPC-capable daemon written in C for better access to kernel APIs with the ability to listen on netlink events. Netifd has replaced the old OpenWrt-network configuration scripts, the actual scripts that configured the network, e.g.
/lib/network/*.sh,/sbin/ifup- some scripts in
/etc/hotplug.d.)
netifd is intended to stay compatible with the existing format of /etc/config/network, the only exceptions being rare special cases like
aliases or the overlay variables in /var/state (though even most of those can be easily emulated).
Help with the development of netifd
- test what has been ported
- review of the code
- help porting more of our protocol handler scripts (so far, static, ppp, pppoe, pppoa and dhcp are supported)
Why do we want netifd?
One thing that netifd does much better then old OpenWrt-network configuration scripts is handling configuration changes. With netfid, when the file /etc/config/network changes, you no longer have to restart all interfaces. Simply run /etc/init.d/network reload. This will issue an ubus-call to netifd, telling it to figure out the difference between runtime state and the new config and apply only that. This works on a per-interface level, even with protocol handlers written as shell scripts.
It boils down to the fact that the current network and interface setup mechanisms (via network configuration scripts) are rather constrained and inflexible:
- lack of statefulness
- tendency for raceconditions
- inability to properly nest protocols
- limited featureset of the ash shell which will not allow for complex interface operations like e.g. calculating ULAs
- you name it
Netifd will be able to manage even complex interface configurations with a mix of bonding, vlans, bridges, etc. and handle the dependencies
between interfaces properly - and of course all that without adding unnecessary bloat. AFAIK there are no alternatives to netifd, e.g. connman seems to be centered around one specifific use case only: having a mobile device access the internet through multiple connections.