[00:16] <Dabian> wrt : You're a bot, right?
[00:16] <hobbs> "a genuine way" ?
[00:16] <Dabian> Well .. "preferred way" :9
[00:17] <common> iproute2
[00:17] <Dabian> I guess worst case, I could simply edit a file in /etc/init.d/
[00:17] <Dabian> add the commands.
[00:22] <Dabian> common : iproute2?
[00:22] <Dabian> hobbs: I guess there is no genuine/prefferred way?
[00:23] <Dabian> (Sorry for my bad english)
[00:26] <Dabian> Know any public relays or proxies or something I can use to "see myself from the outside" ?
[00:39] <Bartman007> Dabian: write your own shell script to do it.
[00:40] <hobbs> It would be nice if we could just use the usual ifupdown framework (with pre/post hooks and /e/n/interfaces) but of course I understand the preference for having that stuff in nvram :)
[00:42] <Bartman007> hobbs: White Russian will be inheriting the Kamikaze /etc/config/ style for configuration at some point in the future.
[00:43] <hobbs> Bartman007: I haven't used Kamikaze, but if you say it's a nicer setup, I'll believe you :)
[00:44] <hobbs> Bartman007: I'm used to OpenZaurus more than OpenWRT, and OZ is a highly debian-inspired system :)
[00:44] <h3sp4wn_> I think the kamikaze style is alot easier (as you don't have so much junk you don't need)
[00:44] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: Does oz use ipk or deb ?
[00:44] <hobbs> ipk
[00:45] <Bartman007> it matches a more standard linux way of doing things, /etc/config/network stores all of your if settings, similar to /etc/network/interfaces in debian.
[00:45] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: but ipkg is basically dpkg plus a few small features of apt-get and apt-cache :)
[00:45] <hobbs> and minor file format changes
[00:46] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: I know - but they are compressed with tar and gziped - instead of being compressed with ar
[00:46] <hobbs> right
[00:47] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: I was just wondering if it was based on embeddian debian which it seems not to be - thanks anyway
[00:47] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: no, it's not. Actually I think it's older than emdebian
[00:47] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: If I can get one for a good price I will get one
[00:48] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: it's got a certain amount in common with Familiar; they actually both use the same build system these days
[00:48] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: I just want a small terminal that I can connect to wifi with and use a keyboard
[00:48] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: depends what your idea of a good price is. They're expensive little toys
[00:49] <Kaloz> openzaurus was plain debian iirc with ipkg
[00:49] <Kaloz> and they later changed to uclibc, and got merged into familiar/handhelds.org stuff
[00:50] <hobbs> Kaloz: it's definitely a glibc system
[00:50] <Kaloz> still? i thought they switched to uclibc for a while now
[00:50] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: Not more than $200 (I lose / break things too frequently )
[00:51] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: Maybe more but not $600 or anything thats not worth it for me
[00:52] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: the C1k can be had for $350 new, you might find a C760 or something like that used for $250-300 if you look really hard
[00:53] <hobbs> the very oldest model, the SL-5500, you can get for $200 -- actually, I'll sell you one for $200 -- but it's got a tiny little bit of memory and hardware with no specs and can't keep up with newer stuff ;)
[00:53] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: Does the C1k have a hard disk ?
[00:53] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: no, the 3xxx models do
[00:54] <Dabian> Bartman007 : Thanks!
[00:54] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: CF, SD, and USB OTG though
[00:54] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: Its on my list of things to get if the price and time is right
[00:55] <hobbs> also CIA, FBI, and TLA.
[00:55] <h3sp4wn_> lol
[00:57] <Dabian> hobbs : Whats TLA? Some branch of RIAA?
[00:57] <hobbs> Dabian: Three Letter Acronym ;)
[00:58] <Dabian> hobbs :-D
[02:38] <denon> sigh, back in verizon 1x land
[02:39] <denon> a fate only J4k3 can understand
[02:42] <J4k3> I like 1x
[02:42] <J4k3> since its essentially free for me
[02:43] <J4k3> and I'd like to see a more stable network than freenode
[02:43] <J4k3> it sure as fuck isn't efnet
[02:44] <J4k3> efnet = unstable and chuck full of asshats
[02:44] <exobyte> oftc?
[02:44] <exobyte> but efnet is better for pr0n and other not so legal activities
[02:44] <J4k3> efnet isn't good for anything
[02:45] <exobyte> is freenode reall that unstable?
[02:46] <exobyte> *really
[02:48] <common> J4k3: are you on efnet?
[02:56] <Bartman007> exobyte: you haven't been around lately have you?
[02:56] <exobyte> not all that much
[02:57] <Bartman007> that's why you haven't seen any problems with freenode
[03:03] <xjjk> good evening
[03:03] <xjjk> AthlonRob: funny seeing you here...
[03:04] <xjjk> I'm wanting to use my AP as a wireless client in routed/bridge mode
[03:04] <xjjk> are there any CLI user-friendly clients
[03:04] <xjjk> for displaying wireless networks
[03:04] <xjjk> and connecting to them
[03:04] <h3sp4wn> J4k3: Are the gnaa running rampage over efnet ?
[03:04] <xjjk> iwlist is not the most userfriendly thing
[03:04] <Bartman007> h3sp4wn: I haven't had issues with them
[03:04] <xjjk> especially when many APs are available
[03:05] <xjjk> and I have to discern signal quality from strength and noise
[03:05] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: Do you use efnet alot ?
[03:05] <alxhh> wl scan; sleep 5; wl scanresults
[03:05] <Bartman007> h3sp4wn: yeah
[03:05] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: Right how can we sort out payment and delivery of this gateway ?
[03:06] <xjjk> alxhh: was that to me? what is wl?
[03:06] <xjjk> I don
[03:06] <xjjk> t have it on my AP...
[03:06] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: Or do you just want to wait until monday to send it ?
[03:07] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: (I am still not totally sure how much the insured postage is going to be)
[03:08] <Bartman007> you've got pm
[05:50] <godtvisken> Hey.. suddenly I can't access my router's status page, power cycling doesn't do anything. I can't even ping it, it never really times out, it just hangs trying to reach it
[05:52] <jakllsch> is it in the ARP table?
[05:52] <godtvisken> I know it's not a support channel, but no one replied to my post on the forum after 5 days so far..
[05:52] <godtvisken> jakllsch: I don't know, what's that?
[05:57] <godtvisk1n> jakllsch: yes, it is in the arp table
[05:57] <godtvisk1n> if you mean running `arp`
[06:01] <jakllsch> does ssh work?
[06:01] <godtvisk1n> no, that just hangs too
[06:03] <jakllsch> huh, dunno, does the serial console (if available) reveal anything?
[06:04] <jakllsch> also, have you tried failsafe?
[06:05] <godtvisken> no, i was going to try that next, just seeing if there were other options
[06:24] <godtvisken> I tried going into failsafe mode,
[06:25] <godtvisken> But I still couldn't access it,
[06:25] <godtvisken> even using the IP 192.168.1.1 which the OpenWRT docs say it defaults to in failsafe mode
[06:26] <Bartman007> heh, got my 7001 flashed, and it can't even load the kernel :-)
[06:27] <h3sp4wn> Much fun in store then
[06:30] <Bartman007> heh, now I can't reach my server from the 7001, yet I can reach my router...
[06:31] <h3sp4wn> Is the wireless working ?
[06:31] <h3sp4wn> but no ethernet ?
[06:31] <godtvisken> h3sp4wn: who are you talking to?
[06:32] <Bartman007> no, I'm in Redboot, the XScale equivalent of CFE.
[06:32] <h3sp4wn> Oh right - was talking to bartman
[06:33] <Bartman007> wtf, I only messed with the kernel and rootfs partitions
[06:35] <Bartman007> there is no reason I shouldn't be able to reach the server....
[06:38] <Bartman007> heh, rebooted and now it works right
[06:42] <Bartman007> lol, my kernel sure doesn't boot
[07:09] <denon> anyone know if wl0_txpwr is applicableon the asus dlx units?
[07:09] <denon> wl500dlx that is
[07:10] <Bartman007> ugh... neither http or tftp transfers work.
[07:10] <Bartman007> meaning my kernel doesn't work.
[07:43] <infectedRoot> i got a question for someone
[07:44] <warrior520> just ask
[07:44] <infectedRoot> i have a linksys wrt54g v5. ive found a bazillion links pointing to getting ddwrt on it, but not openwrt on it... how the hell can i get openwrt on this damned router. i hate ddwrt.
[07:45] <infectedRoot> ive found the bitsum link but it doesn't say how to get openwrt on the router
[07:45] <warrior520> have you been to the openwrt website?\
[07:45] <infectedRoot> yep
[07:46] <warrior520> did you read the documentation
[07:47] <godtvisken> infectedRoot: http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware/Linksys/WRT54G and http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Installing
[07:47] <godtvisken> I have the same router and I used those sites
[07:47] <infectedRoot> yup
[07:48] <warrior520> so whats the problem then?
[07:48] <godtvisken> warrior520: I don't know, what /is/ the problem?
[07:48] <infectedRoot> well i try to get the firmware on and it doesn't work
[07:49] <godtvisken> Well what do you try to do?
[07:49] <warrior520> yeah man you need to be more descriptive because the docs are very good
[07:49] <infectedRoot> used the bitsum tutorial : http://www.bitsum.com/openwiking/owbase/ow.asp?WRT54G5%5FCFE
[07:49] <godtvisken> warrior520: er sorry, i thought you were the other guy when i said "what /is/ the problem?"
[07:49] <infectedRoot> but i only got ddwrt on there
[07:50] <godtvisken> infectedRoot: the second link I posted should be sufficient..
[07:50] <Bartman007> infectedRoot: let me save you time and energy. The v5's are crap. DD-wrt micro is the best you are going to be able to get on there
[07:51] <Bartman007> openwrt micro fits, but good luck installing any additional packages
[07:51] <godtvisken> anyways, does anyone know what's going on? I have an WRT54G v3 and I have OpenWRT successufully installed and I have accessed the status page before (and ssh'ed into it) but now all of a sudden I can't, I have tried to reboot it and go into failsafe. I can't get into failsafe though, the DMZ light flashes like it should, but I can't access 192.168.1.1
[07:51] <Bartman007> you have to build your own images to get anything to fit
[07:51] <godtvisken> the device works fine otherwise,
[07:51] <godtvisken> i have it set up as a bridge and i am online with it..
[07:52] <warrior520> godtvisken: its alright man, i know how it is
[07:52] <Bartman007> godtvisken: sometimes you have to clear your arp cache to see it in safe mode
[07:52] <godtvisken> Bartman007: how do i do that?
[07:52] <Bartman007> depends on your OS
[07:52] <warrior520> ohh shit you know what, I was outside, but I forgot all about that you said it was v5
[07:53] <warrior520> why did you buy a v5??
[07:55] <godtvisk1n> sorry, problems with my modem lately too. anyways, i last saw this if anyone said anything else:
[07:55] <godtvisk1n> 22:45 Bartman007> depends on your OS
[07:55] <godtvisk1n> 22:45 godtvisken> running debian
[07:56] <DarkDrgn2k> Hey, is itr true that a rev 5 can run openwrt (micro) or not
[07:56] <Bartman007> godtvisken: I think I'm actually thinking of other things, and it's not needed for failsafe...
[07:56] <Bartman007> DarkDrgn2k: yes it is true.
[07:57] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: the link in the main website links to a ddwrt solution, any one know of the open wrt solution
[07:57] <Bartman007> the OpenWRT micro image.
[07:58] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: yes how do u put that image on.. is there a special way
[07:58] <godtvisk1n> Bartman007: hm, so any other ideas?
[07:59] <Bartman007> DarkDrgn2k: if you've already loaded CFE onto the v5, just follow the installation instructions.
[07:59] <Bartman007> godtvisk1n: you're using a squashfs image?
[07:59] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: whats cfe?
[08:00] <synth> what's a squash??
[08:00] <DarkDrgn2k> Syncros: there are 2 versions of the file system
[08:00] <synth> heh.
[08:00] <Bartman007> wget a_aclue
[08:00] <godtvisk1n> synth: http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Installing#head-3d6480403b294d4c261f360ab9efc82f388a8790
[08:00] <DarkDrgn2k> Syncros: squashfs and jiffs...
[08:00] <synth> im being sarcastic :D
[08:00] <DarkDrgn2k> :-S
[08:00] <DarkDrgn2k> so whats "cfe"
[08:00] <godtvisk1n> Bartman007: yeah
[08:00] <godtvisk1n> Bartman007: yeah, using squash
[08:01] <synth> compact flash
[08:01] <Bartman007> godtvisk1n: then it should be working.
[08:01] <synth> eeeeesomething
[08:01] <DarkDrgn2k> ok well i dont get this comment: " if you've already loaded CFE onto the v5"
[08:01] <synth> yeah
[08:01] <Bartman007> synth: I would assume it's Common Firmware Environment
[08:02] <synth> Bartman007: ah, ok
[08:02] <synth> the boot prom
[08:02] <Bartman007> DarkDrgn2k: then you haven't read the bitsum guide enough...
[08:02] <DarkDrgn2k> so how do u load the cfe then?
[08:02] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: i did.. and bricked a wrt :-P
[08:02] <synth> that wonderful thingy that saves me when i screw my wrt
[08:02] <godtvisk1n> Bartman007: well.. it's not (: i mean, it is doing it's job, acting as a bridge, but i can't check it's status
[08:02] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: hance me supoer cautiouseness
[08:04] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: ok i managed to get ddwrt on the router, how can i swich it to openwrt?
[08:05] <Bartman007> read the openwrt install documentation.
[08:06] <Bartman007> godtvisk1n: you sure you have the correct ip?
[08:07] <godtvisk1n> Bartman007: well, when it goes into failsafe it should default to 192.168.1.1, right?
[08:08] <DarkDrgn2k> godtvisk1n: yes
[08:08] <Bartman007> you sure your computer has a 192.168.1.x address?
[08:08] <godtvisk1n> inet addr:192.168.1.103
[08:09] <godtvisk1n> Well, maybe the other router is interfering, because it runs at 192.168.1.1 by default.. but I have been into safemode and now I restarted the router again, shouldn't the settings have been earased?
[08:09] <godtvisk1n> so I shouldn't even be online
[08:10] <Bartman007> so your main (non-bridged) router runs as 192.168.1.1?
[08:10] <godtvisk1n> yeah
[08:11] <godtvisk1n> so I set my bridged one to run at 192.168.1.129
[08:11] <Bartman007> yeah... flush your arp cache... read up on how to do it.
[08:11] <godtvisk1n> ok
[08:19] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: you know what the firmware for the v5s are..
[08:19] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: i keep getting patter errors with openwrt-wrt54g-squashfs.bin
[08:22] <Bartman007> um... that's not the image you should be using... If you had read the notes on the dd-wrt website you would know that.
[08:24] <Bh420> duh
[08:24] <Bh420> :P
[08:25] <Bartman007> Bh420: that's not any help.
[08:29] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: ummm.. what image should i be using... i cant seem to find any ref of openwrt on bit's tutiraol
[08:30] <Bartman007> did you download the wrt54g image of dd-wrt micro?
[08:31] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: yez i managed to get dd-wrt working
[08:31] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: but i want to install openwrt
[08:31] <Bartman007> no you didn't download the wrt54g image
[08:31] <Bartman007> look at the file name
[08:32] <DarkDrgn2k> ??? openwrt-wrt54g
[08:32] <DarkDrgn2k> i didnt download the image.. wat?
[08:32] <Bartman007> you didn't download the *wrt54g* image of dd-wrt
[08:33] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: i want to install openwrt not dd-wrt
[08:33] <Bartman007> OpenWRT and DD-wrt work on more devices than just the Linksys WRT54G(S)
[08:33] Action: DarkDrgn2k thinks hes missing somethign
[08:33] <DarkDrgn2k> openwrt-wrt54g-squashfs.bin <- looks like wrt54g to me!!!
[08:33] <DarkDrgn2k> please tell me what im missing
[08:33] <Bartman007> openwrt != dd-wrt
[08:34] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: yes i know
[08:34] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: i want to isntall OPENWRT
[08:34] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: currently i have dd-wrt installed
[08:34] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: when i try to tftp the openwrt image it says invalid pattern (or w/e)
[08:34] <Bartman007> yes.
[08:34] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: so what am i doing wrong
[08:34] <Bartman007> you downloaded the *generic* image of dd-wrt
[08:35] <Bartman007> as such you should download the generic image of openwrt
[08:35] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: not the micro?
[08:35] <Bartman007> the wrt54g images for each have extra data at the begining so the wrt54g models (pre v5) will take them
[08:35] <Bartman007> yes, still use the micro images, but not the wrt54g images.
[08:35] <DarkDrgn2k> what other images are there...
[08:36] <DarkDrgn2k> there wrt54gs
[08:36] <DarkDrgn2k> wa840g
[08:36] <DarkDrgn2k> brcms.. i see no "generic"
[08:36] Action: DarkDrgn2k feels dumb right now
[08:36] <Bartman007> http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Installing#head-40b613e9790c8eaa414d75f77fe919c2ad371791
[08:37] <Bartman007> ok sorry, it doesn't explicitly say in the install guide that the bcrm images are generic device images
[08:37] <DarkDrgn2k> ooooo ok
[08:38] <Bartman007> pretty much your wrt54g v5 becomes a generic broadcom router when you flash the vxkiller file onto it.
[08:38] <DarkDrgn2k> THANK YOU so i need to use the brcm
[08:38] <Bartman007> that is why you have to use the generic dd-wrt image, and the bcrm openwrt images
[08:38] <DarkDrgn2k> gotcha
[08:38] <DarkDrgn2k> LOL no wonder nothign worked!
[08:38] Action: DarkDrgn2k udnerstands now
[08:39] <Bartman007> I was trying to get you to figure it out yourself, but I thought that the dd-wrt wiki and openwrt wiki had the needed information more readily available.
[08:39] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: i know what you where trinig to do but the brcm file being generic is what screwed me up (and brivcked a perfectly good router)
[08:40] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: you screw the boot loader so it doenst know its a wrt anymjore..
[08:41] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: and some of those forums posts now start to make sence
[08:42] <DarkDrgn2k> " WARNING OpenWrt White Russian has no failsafe mode for JFFS2 firmware images.
[08:42] <DarkDrgn2k> what.. no "fail safe" mode ?!?!?
[08:43] <Bartman007> yes, http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Troubleshooting?highlight=%28failsafe%29
[08:45] <Bartman007> I'm off to bed, good luck.
[08:45] <DarkDrgn2k> thanx mate
[10:47] <nbd> .
[10:48] <[mbm]> ..
[11:57] <mic_> hi, do i need to install dropbear sshd daemon at first?
[12:23] <zamba> how can i force a reinitiate of a wds link?
[12:23] <zamba> wds link using wpa, that is
[12:32] <blop> zamba: reboot one of the AP =)
[12:33] <zamba> blop: it's enough just to do one of them, yeah?
[12:33] <zamba> because the other will be placed on a mountain top :)
[12:33] <zamba> so it's kind of hard to reboot it :)
[12:33] <zamba> unless you have a bazooka around
[12:33] <zamba> ok, nevermind rebooting :)
[12:33] <blop> i dont know well the process of wds linking , i cant tell :/
[12:34] <blop> but u can reboot a distant AP
[12:34] <blop> if u're sure it will come back alive :)
[12:34] <zamba> sure
[12:53] <mic_> question... wl0_auth_mode is set to open
[12:53] <mic_> do i need to unset this if i want to use WPA
[12:53] <mic_> and if yes, how can i do that
[12:54] <zamba> it's not used anymore
[12:54] <zamba> wl0_akm is used instead
[12:55] <zamba> and you set that to either open, wpa, psk, wpa2 or psk2
[12:55] <mic_> but wl0_auth_mode is there
[12:55] <zamba> well, it's not used
[12:55] <mic_> ok
[12:55] <zamba> do nvram unset wl0_auth_mode if it bothers you
[12:55] <mic_> so i have another issue
[12:55] <mic_> maybe a problem to use psk psk2
[12:56] <blop> [12:47:53] <mic_> but wl0_auth_mode is there => nvram unset wl0_auth_mode :) if its not used anymore u can unset it
[12:56] <blop> dam :) grilled :D
[12:56] <mic_> indeed
[12:56] <mic_> :)
[12:57] <mic_> however i cannot log on
[12:57] <mic_> maybe iBook doesn't work
[13:05] <mic_> are there any possibilities to analyze why it isn't possible to log-on the wlan?
[13:59] <sk2> Hi, I've just been handed a WRT54G v3 for which the root password has been lost. I am unable to ping it on 192.168.1.1 after I reset it, but I can get an ssh prompt on the 10.x range it was set to after it boots. If the DMZ light never comes on then I will have to short the flash chip to get into failsafe won't I?
[14:01] <sk2> what's weird is the power button is continually flashing
[14:06] <Ionic_NB> Hi, might anyone guide me through switching from WEP to WPA step by step? I want to be sure that everything was made right :/
[14:07] <mic_> there is guide on the wiki
[14:07] <mic_> which is NOT reachable
[14:07] <Ionic_NB> For setting up WPA, yes
[14:07] <Ionic_NB> But not for switching
[14:07] <mic_> where is the different between this?
[14:08] <sk2> ns
[14:09] <sk2> cant you just setup wpa?
[14:09] <Ionic_NB> mic_: I think I have to disable WEP first, don't I?
[14:09] <Ionic_NB> sk2: I tried yesterday but couldn't connect to the AP
[14:09] <Ionic_NB> Now, I want to be really sure the AP is working correctly
[14:10] <mic_> Ionic_NB: use the webfrontend....
[14:10] <Ionic_NB> Nah...
[14:10] <Ionic_NB> I don't know how it behaves since it's pivot_rooted and so on
[14:10] <sk2> why not?
[14:11] <mic_> i cannot get WPA working
[14:11] <mic_> but i think i know now why...
[14:12] <Ionic_NB> Mh
[14:13] <mic_> can anyone answer me
[14:13] <mic_> if WPA is not working, if the DHCP server is not reachable?
[14:13] <sk2> correct
[14:13] <mic_> indeed
[14:13] <sk2> seeing as you will have no dataflow...
[14:13] <mic_> then i have to now why isn't it reachable via wlan
[14:13] <sk2> huh?
[14:13] <mic_> my dhcp server is NOT on my wrt
[14:13] <mic_> i'm using a ipcop router
[14:14] <mic_> and the wrt just as a switch and an access-point
[14:14] <sk2> if WPA is screwed you will have no dataflow...
[14:15] <Ionic_NB> Mh
[14:15] <mic_> the questions is indeed
[14:15] <mic_> WHY the DHCP server is not reachable
[14:15] <mic_> for wlan
[14:15] <sk2> wtf
[14:15] <sk2> are you running WPA across the wifi link?
[14:16] <mic_> yes
[14:16] <mic_> but i couldn't log on
[14:16] <sk2> and is WPA working?
[14:16] <mic_> no it is not
[14:16] <mic_> no i have disabled authentication
[14:16] <sk2> then wtf are you asking about dhcp for?
[14:16] <mic_> my client get a connection but not an IP
[14:16] Action: sk2 sigh
[14:17] <mic_> the problem i don't know what is wrong
[14:17] <mic_> i reconfigured the vlans
[14:17] <sk2> do static ips work?
[14:17] <mic_> because i don't need the WAN interface
[14:17] <mic_> does WPA work with static ip's?
[14:18] <sk2> WPA doesnt give a shit about how your ips are assigned
[14:18] <sk2> basically
[14:18] <sk2> can you get dataflow across the wireless link?
[14:18] <mic_> is it possible to see that?
[14:18] <mic_> i couldn't find any log file
[14:18] <mic_> or anything like this to see what happen on the wrt
[14:19] <sk2> does stuff work across the wireless link?
[14:19] <mic_> if i disable wpa yes
[14:19] <sk2> how do you verify this?
[14:19] <mic_> i logged on
[14:19] <mic_> and give the client a static ip
[14:20] <mic_> i saw that the client doesn't got an IP from my dhcp server
[14:20] <sk2> can you ping with statically assigned ips?
[14:22] <mic_> indeed i cannot
[14:22] <mic_> "host is down"
[14:22] <sk2> ok
[14:22] <sk2> i'd say your wpa is fucked
[14:22] <sk2> forget the dhcp
[14:23] <mic_> well
[14:23] <mic_> my wpa is disabled
[14:23] <mic_> this was without encryption
[14:23] <sk2> checked ips/subnets?
[14:23] <mic_> yep
[14:24] <mic_> i think i made anything wrong reconfiguring vlans
[14:24] <mic_> and bridging lan and wifi
[14:31] <Ionic_NB> So... what am I supposed to do first? ifconfig eth1 down?
[14:34] <Ionic_NB> Mh I'll set the 3 nvram variables first
[14:38] <Ionic_NB> Btw, can I use whitespaces in my preshared key?
[14:52] <pablo> when i change the nvram directives, they dont change in the web interface
[14:52] <Ionic_NB> pablo: try nvram commit
[14:53] <pablo> wl0_closed=0 commit?
[14:55] <Ionic_NB> nvram commit
[14:56] <pablo> thanks
[14:59] <Ionic_NB> Is really no one in here who might help me switching from WEP to WPA? :(
[15:23] <Bartman007> jeez the efnet hub I'm n netsplit nearly 3 hours ago, and still hasn't rejoined the rest of the network
[15:24] <common> irc.efnet.nl
[15:24] <common> rocksolid
[15:28] <Bartman007> and over 6000 miles away.
[15:28] <Bartman007> I switched the the LA server, hopefully it is more stable than the SF server.
[15:29] <Bartman007> to the*
[15:36] <sk2> Is anyone here familiar with WRT54G v3?
[15:36] <sk2> I have one that the password has been forgotten for.
[15:37] <common> attach serial console
[15:37] <sk2> is that the only solution? If so I'll hand it back and tell him its his problem.
[15:38] <sk2> The DMZ light never lights.
[15:45] <Fonero> huhu
[15:47] <[mbm]> sk2: just boot the damned thing into failsafe :P
[15:50] <sk2> [mbm]: I can't ping the damn thing on 192.168.1.1 regardles... which is odd as I get the ssh prompt once it's loaded
[15:50] <sk2> ssh prompt on 10.something wacked he set
[15:51] <blop> Ydef? :)
[16:09] <sk2> so [mbm], if the thing won't repond to pings at 192.168.1.1, and reset button doesn't do anything, the only failsafe option I have is resetting flash/jtag isn't it?
[16:10] <Ionic_NB> Hmm... I set all variables in NVRAM that are used for WPA, what should I do now? I think it should still use WEP, shouldn't it?
[16:11] <Ionic_NB> Do I have to shut down the WLAN interface first and then start nas?
[16:33] <Ionic_NB> Am I really that annoying? :P
[16:35] <zamba> indeed
[16:35] <zamba> :)
[16:39] <Ionic_NB> I just don't know what to do :p
[16:55] <Ionic_NB> And still not working...
[17:16] <Ionic_NB> And as far as I can see in the WebIF the router is using WPA-PSK
[17:17] <ptobler> hey
[17:20] <ptobler> is there a way to implement port triggering on the white russian rc5?
[17:39] <Fonero> huhu
[17:52] <b_d_p> i can get anything up at the following pages: http://wiki.openwrt.org/TableOfHardware and http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Configuration the rest of the wiki is fine, can somebody check them?
[17:52] <b_d_p> same issue for a couple days
[18:02] <b_d_p> 200+ idlers huh?
[18:06] <zoo> sure
[18:11] <b_d_p> :)
[18:14] <ptobler> weird. i can'T connect from the wlan to any of the wired computers
[18:14] <ptobler> is that intended by openwrt?
[18:48] <denon> quiet place today
[19:18] <Bartman007> Kaloz: either my kernel image is bad, or I'm completely inept. I can successfully send the kernel and rootfs over, and commit them to flash, but I can't get past there. When attempting to load the kernel, it doesn't get past "Using base address 0x0001c400 and length 0x00100000" in the exec command (so its not running anything in the kernel.)
[19:29] <denon> anyone use iwlist for active scanning kinda stuff?
[19:29] <denon> it seems to kinda flake out if you scan too frequently
[19:41] <Stormy> What's the easist way to reset an openwrt install back to default values? WRT54G v2.
[19:41] <Stormy> i thought i read something about the switch in the back is not safe to use
[19:57] <twb> Is there a way to get dnsmasq to reread it's config file?
[19:59] <crazy_imp> twb: don't know, but one way is killall dnsmasq and restart it
[20:01] <common> kill -HUP
[20:07] <somedude_> Hi, i managed to get my openwrt ccpmmected to a bssid via "client" mode, but how do i cange teh fire to nat on the wifi connection not he ont eh wan port
[20:18] <twb> Thanks.
[20:28] <somedude_> how do you nat a connction again?
[20:29] <Bh420> rtfm
[20:29] <somedude_> Bh420: i been trying to ... dam old fms
[20:34] <lllegal> I'm having issues with pptp connection: after hour or two of fine web expwrience, suddenly packets stop traveling to server end of pptp connection. when i ping client ip at wrt end of tunnel I see icmp request and reply going back but not apearing at server side interface.. is this a known issue or bug, any ideas ?
[20:36] <somedude_> iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -o br0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
[20:36] <somedude_> iptables -A FORWARD -i br0 -o eth1 -j ACCEPT
[20:37] <somedude_> <--- any idea whast wrong
[20:38] <ed> somedude_: and what's the problem? ;p
[20:39] <ed> why are you using "br0" ?
[20:39] <lllegal> also the log is full of: Jul 22 21:31:19 (none) kern.warn pppd[672]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x5b14
[20:39] <ed> br0 is the bridge interface
[20:39] <ed> should never been used
[20:39] <ed> lllegal: unset mppe in your client, and set ms chap v2 as auth proto
[20:40] <somedude_> ed: not to screw with ethe nvram.. br0 is simply the lan internet - wifi
[20:40] <ed> no.
[20:40] <ed> it's the bridge, and that's all
[20:40] <ed> you should never use that interface as a real interface.
[20:40] <somedude_> so instead of br use eth0?
[20:40] <ed> no
[20:40] <ed> completely wrong
[20:40] <ed> use vlan*
[20:40] <ed> refers to doc.
[20:41] <somedude_> vlan0 is lan vlan1 is wan
[20:41] <somedude_> lol doh
[20:41] <ed> eth0 is an internal interface
[20:41] <ed> unusable
[20:41] <somedude_> ok
[20:41] <ed> -(20:33:57)- <somedude_> vlan0 is lan vlan1 is wan
[20:41] <ed> then...
[20:42] <somedude_> iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -o vlan0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
[20:42] <somedude_> iptables -A FORWARD -i vlan0 -o eth1 -j ACCEPT
[20:42] <somedude_> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE
[20:42] <somedude_> iptables -A INPUT -i vlan0 -j ACCEPT
[20:42] <somedude_> iptables -A FORWARD -i vlan0 -j ACCEPT
[20:42] <ed> uh
[20:42] <ed> you want nat from lan => wifi ?
[20:43] <somedude_> yes\\
[20:43] <ed> -(20:35:06)- <somedude_> iptables -A FORWARD -i vlan0 -j ACCEPT
[20:43] <ed> uh
[20:43] <ed> ok
[20:43] <somedude_> i wish to nat the WIFI not the WAN port lol
[20:43] <ed> then, should be ok ?
[20:43] <ed> don't know what you wanna do
[20:43] <somedude_> but wait
[20:43] <somedude_> isnt vlan0 INCLUDE wifi?
[20:43] <ed> no
[20:43] <ed> wait
[20:43] <somedude_> right its br0:-P
[20:44] <ed> http://ed.zehome.com/?page=wrt54g << look the scheme
[20:44] <somedude_> i want to have a secure network, contected via wifi to the main tineret stream
[20:44] <Bartman007> somedude_: the default firewall rules are quite secure.
[20:44] <ed> firewall does not increase security
[20:44] <somedude_> Bartman007: yes.. for WAN
[20:45] <somedude_> Bartman007: but i want to connect to a netwqork on teh oether side of the house via WIFI
[20:45] <somedude_> Bartman007: have it on a seperate subnet, and nat into the lan
[20:45] <ed> you should *NEVER* consider only using a firewall if you want security.
[20:45] <somedude_> ed: psudo security
[20:45] <Bartman007> somedude_: search the openWRT wiki for client mode.
[20:45] <ed> no.
[20:45] <ed> 0 security
[20:45] <somedude_> ed: i dont want shit to get routed back basically.
[20:46] <ed> that's what's doing right now with your rules.
[20:46] <mic_> hi, when this site will be up again: http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Configuration
[20:46] <somedude_> ed
[20:46] <somedude_> ed: but it doesnt work
[20:46] <somedude_> Tracing route to 216.239.39.104 over a maximum of 30 hops
[20:46] <somedude_> 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.32.254
[20:46] <somedude_> 2 * * * Request timed out.
[20:46] <Bartman007> mic_: it is up.
[20:46] <somedude_> 254 is the default router
[20:46] <mic_> Bartman007: it's empty...
[20:46] <mic_> just a white page
[20:46] <lllegal> ed: this server accepts only mschapv2 and mppe anyway
[20:46] <Bartman007> mic_: not for me...
[20:47] <mic_> hm
[20:47] <lllegal> ed: I have refuse eap, pap, chap and mppe required,stateless,no40,no56 in options and I don't see what else could be done
[20:47] <ed> somedude_: I think you're doing the nat the wrong way.
[20:47] <ed> lllegal: disable mppc
[20:47] <somedude_> ed: what should i be doing then?
[20:47] <lllegal> hmm, had that in pre nvram style
[20:47] <ed> (nomppc if i remember correctly)
[20:47] <lllegal> must try
[20:47] <ed> somedude_: invert the nat.
[20:48] <ed> you want nat on eth1
[20:48] <ed> oop
[20:48] <ed> ss
[20:48] <ed> sorry
[20:48] <ed> yes well :)
[20:48] <Bartman007> somedude_: if you followed the steps in this guide: http://wiki.openwrt.org/ClientModeHowto you wouldn't have needed to butcher your firewall
[20:49] <ed> then
[20:49] <somedude_> Bartman007: will it NAT the WIFI interface ?
[20:49] <ed> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -i eth1 -o vlan1 -j MASQUERADE
[20:49] <ed> that's what you want
[20:49] <Bartman007> the WIFI interface would become your $WAN
[20:49] <ed> or vlan0 don't remember.
[20:49] <somedude_> Bartman007: but i dot wanan scew with the vram
[20:49] <ed> depends you'r config ;:p
[20:49] <ed> -'
[20:50] <somedude_> y vlan1?
[20:50] <somedude_> nm
[20:50] <Bartman007> somedude_: you have to change nvram variables no matter what, unless you choose not to use a lot of the framework the openWRT has setup to make your life easier.
[20:50] <ed> well, that's only network filtering, so ... not really related to openwrt
[20:51] <somedude_> Bartman007: yes.. but nvram cant get overwriten with a simple flash
[20:51] <ed> so, if you've some problems with filtering, then reports to the netfilter documentation
[20:51] <somedude_> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -i eth1 -o vlan1 -j MASQUERADE
[20:51] <somedude_> iptables v1.3.3: Can't use -i with POSTROUTING
[20:51] <ed> s/-i//g
[20:51] <Bartman007> somedude_: wth does that have to do with anything?
[20:52] <somedude_> <ed> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -i eth1 -o vlan1 -j MASQUERADE
[20:52] <ed> somedude_: well, i'm not perfect, and that's a " by earth " command line i gave you
[20:52] <ed> so
[20:52] <ed> now
[20:52] <somedude_> yes yes
[20:52] <ed> i've done a mistake, then, removes '-i eth1'.
[20:52] <somedude_> no -i
[20:52] <somedude_> sitll doesnt work :-S
[20:54] <ed> haha
[20:54] Action: somedude_ going crazy
[20:54] <ed> pv me your config man.
[20:54] <Bartman007> somedude_: why are you so paranoid about changing the nvram. nvram configuration is required for openWRT unless you are written shell scripts to duplicate functionality built-in openWRT.
[20:58] <somedude_> Bartman007: i cant re-set nvram defaults
[20:58] <Bartman007> somedude_: then save a copy of the output of `nvram show` somewhere.
[20:58] <landonf_> Anyone noted that the wr54g can't pull off anything near wirespeed? It's churning through CPU cycles in the interrupt handler, I'm getting barely 25 Mbps.
[20:59] <Bartman007> landonf_: is this wan-to-lan performance?
[20:59] <landonf_> Yep
[20:59] <Bartman007> the wrt can achieve wirespeed in lan-to-lan
[20:59] <landonf_> Since that's all in the switch, isn't it?
[20:59] <ed> landonf_: you'll get better performance with iptables disabled.
[20:59] <somedude_> Bartman007: fine lest try it your way
[21:00] <ed> landonf_: what's the size of the packets you're routing ?
[21:00] <Bartman007> pretty much, the wrt only has one physical ethernet port for wan and lan. this is hooked up to a 6 port switch, 1 port for the wrt, 1 for wan, and 4 for lan
[21:00] <ed> that's *VERY* important on little cpus ...
[21:00] <ed> more packets they are, slower it is !
[21:01] <ed> so routing tiny packets costs a lot more that routing big packets
[21:01] <ed> => bw impacted directly
[21:01] <Bartman007> since all wired traffic travels through eth0, the wrt has to tell it where to go using vlans. so the wrt has to modify each and every packet... 25Mbps is pretty typical for these little 200mhz mipsel processors
[21:01] <landonf_> Yeah, lots more interrupts. But in this case I'm generally pushing the full 1500 bytes.
[21:02] <landonf_> Bartman007: Fair enough. VLAN tagging for the slow.
[21:02] <Bartman007> landonf_: don't waste your time trying to acheive anything better. that's as good as you can get from a wrt54g
[21:03] <common> landonf_: if yoi have 25mbit inet connection you should spend little more money on a router than 50 bucks
[21:03] <landonf_> Is there hardware I'm going to see better from?
[21:04] <Bartman007> landonf_: a soekris or routerboard should provide better performance, but those require you to build your own kamikaze images
[21:04] <landonf_> hmm, was just looking at the soekris boards.
[21:04] <common> http://www.tomsnetworking.com/lans_routers/charts/index.html?chart=119
[21:04] <landonf_> common: Just my access point. I have a LAN ... :)
[21:04] <Bartman007> if you have an old computer, slap an additional nic in it, and install IPCop or pfSense, or any other router-oriented distro
[21:05] <common> landonf_: so you care about wifi <-> lan speed?
[21:05] <landonf_> Bartman007: Idea was basically to get rid of as many noisy PCs as possible at the new apartment
[21:05] <landonf_> common: Yep
[21:05] <Bartman007> landonf_: wait, you want higher than 25Mbps wlan perf?
[21:06] <common> 25mbit for wifi is pretty much
[21:06] <Bartman007> standard 11g won't get you any higher.
[21:06] <ed> landonf_: you should consider using a C7 processor
[21:06] <ed> or a C3 1Ghz processor
[21:06] <common> ed
[21:06] <mic_> question... why isn't it possible to get an IP from DHCP server in network after configuring the IP address of the openwrt via DHCP
[21:06] <common> does not change a diam on wifi
[21:06] <landonf_> Even with 54g?
[21:06] <common> even with 54g
[21:07] <landonf_> I mean, I assumed that 54 Mbits is a theoretical maximum, but 25 Mbits is the realistic maximum?
[21:07] <Bartman007> landonf_: without getting into it too much 54Mbps is the signalling speed, the overhead of wifi is quite large...
[21:07] <ed> common: i know that !
[21:07] <Bartman007> you will NEVER hit 54Mbps not even theoretical.
[21:07] <landonf_> Guess I didn't realize the overhead was that substantial.
[21:07] <landonf_> Well poop.
[21:08] <ed> 802.11 overhead, ethernet overhead, ip overhead, tcp overhead, then link quality !
[21:08] <landonf_> I've got a very difficult to wire apartment
[21:08] <ed> and layer 7 overhead
[21:08] <ed> landonf_: why not using 2 links with bonding ?
[21:08] <landonf_> ed: Sure, but 802.11 overhead would have to be pretty substantial to drop 54 Mbps to 25. But then, I guess there *is* link quality ...
[21:09] <somedude_> Bartman007: didnt evne give me a route to eth1's interface now
[21:10] <ed> landonf_: is the load of your router going up to 1.00 with 25Mbps of trafic ?
[21:10] <landonf_> yes. Which is what led me to believe it was a hardware limitation :)
[21:10] <ed> sure.
[21:10] <Bartman007> somedude_: unfortunately I can't troubleshoot it since it sounds like you have done some extensive modifications to your setup.
[21:10] <ed> the wrt have a tiny processor ;)
[21:11] <ed> landonf_: try disabling iptables :)
[21:11] <somedude_> Bartman007: nop made none, it was all in a ascript that once rebooted all the changes disapeared
[21:11] <somedude_> Bartman007: i got a recentrly flashed wrt,
[21:11] <ed> (don't compile netfilter in the kernel)
[21:11] <ed>
[21:11] <ed> going to eat bye
[21:11] <landonf_> Aww man. I was hoping to avoid recompiling things.
[21:11] <landonf_> Alas.
[21:11] <somedude_> Bartman007: and for some reason i dont have a vlan1 anymore.
[21:11] <Bartman007> somedude_: so you followed the guide for routed client mode?
[21:12] <somedude_> yep
[21:12] <somedude_> bunch of nvram commands
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set wl0_mode=sta # routed client
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set lan_ifnames="vlan0 eth1"
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set wan_ifname=vlan1
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set lan_ifname=br0
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set lan_ifnames=vlan0
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set wan_ifname=eth1
[21:12] <somedude_> only change is i did not do dhcp on wan but static
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set lan_ipaddr=192.168.2.1
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set lan_proto=static
[21:13] <somedude_> oops nvram set lan_ipaddr=192.168.32.254
[21:13] <somedude_> nvram set wan_ipaddr=192.168.0.254
[21:13] <somedude_> nvram set wan_proto=static
[21:13] <somedude_> ooo no default ..
[21:13] <lllegall> landonf_: I thought 16-19Mbit/s was max with 802.11g, afterburner ?
[21:14] <mic_> if i set lan_proto to dhcp
[21:14] <mic_> it is not possible for wlan clients to get an IP from DHCP serer
[21:14] <mic_> but why??
[21:14] <landonf_> lllegall: Doesn't seem to be the case, as I'm pushing 25 Mbps, WAN to LAN.
[21:14] <lllegall> right
[21:14] <Bartman007> mic_: lan_proto is the wrt what it should set it's lan ip address to.
[21:14] <lllegall> I thought wifi to wifi
[21:15] <mic_> Bartman007: but it is possible to use DHCP???
[21:15] <Bartman007> lllegall: I hit around 18-19Mbps wifi performance myself
[21:15] <Bartman007> mic_: for what? be more descriptive.
[21:15] <mic_> Bartman007: i have an ipcop router on my network, which act as a dhcp server
[21:16] <mic_> all clients should get their ip from this ipcop router
[21:16] <Bartman007> and how is the wrt connected to that?
[21:16] <mic_> normal lan port
[21:17] <Bartman007> then you should diable the wrt's dhcp server
[21:17] <mic_> is it still active at default?
[21:17] <Bartman007> unless you tell it otherwise, yes.
[21:17] <mic_> hmm
[21:17] <mic_> strange strange
[21:18] <mic_> because clients connected to the LAN ports of WRT
[21:18] <mic_> get their ip from my ipcop
[21:18] <mic_> just the wlan clients don't get
[21:18] <landonf_> heh. Wonder how bad ethernet over power is.
[21:18] <landonf_> Netgear claims 85 Mbps on their product.
[21:19] <tojoe> landonf_ i never got more than 8 mbit on that stuff
[21:19] <Bartman007> landonf_: they use Atheros's SuperG which uses multiple channels and proprietary tech.
[21:21] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: Have you got superg working yet ? I have looked at the spec sheet but never managed to find a channel its aloud to work on
[21:21] <Bartman007> IIRC superg only works on channel 6.
[21:21] <mic_> Bartman007: dnsmasq is the the dhcp server, isn't it?
[21:22] <Bartman007> but I have never tried testing it. only SuperG capable client card I have is a cardbus card I only use for PenTesting
[21:22] <Bartman007> mic_: yes
[21:22] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: That is what I thought but there is a spec sheet from madwifi that lists many different channels it can work on (When countrycode is set to different values there is various mhz settings it can work on)
[21:22] <Bartman007> h3sp4wn: maybe, I heard the channel 6 thing at some point in here. I've never used it myself.
[21:23] <mic_> so i have to delete the symlink in /etc/init.d
[21:23] <mic_> ...
[21:23] <Bartman007> I do plan on using SuperA with my 7001 once I get everything up :-)
[21:23] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: Its all the default netgear firmware can use but I have my doubts as to whether its working at all with madwifi at the moment
[21:24] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: Or maybe I just can't understand the spec sheet and how to convert it into anything I can put into the router
[21:27] <landonf> join #quagga
[21:27] <landonf> woops
[21:29] <Bejgli> wrt!!
[21:35] <mic_> hm hm
[21:35] <mic_> missconfigured IP
[21:35] <mic_> if i try to use tftp it will not work, but i could see in ping that the router react
[21:35] <mic_> any ideas how to reset the router?
[21:40] <Bejgli> press the button on the back
[21:41] <mic_> as i read this doesn't work
[21:41] <mic_> hmm
[21:41] <mic_> i'll try
[21:50] <blop> what's that topic about ?
[21:51] <blop> freenode isnt good enough ?
[21:57] <surfatwork> discovered openwrt a couple of weeks ago...
[21:58] <surfatwork> thought I'd find some help here on getting a kamikaze image for the wgt634u
[21:58] <surfatwork> i am ok with linux, have the bits for a serial cable
[21:59] <surfatwork> and btw, I am in favor of movin to a more stable network...
[21:59] <J4k3> ...
[21:59] <surfatwork> i am not able to access flyashi's site, hence came here
[22:02] <surfatwork> Ydef: I'd appreciate it if I could get a username/pwd so I can atleast download from klasseonline
[22:09] Action: nbd removes the wiki reference to flyashi's site...
[22:10] <warrior520> I am also wondering about the topic, is this channel going to move to another server?
[22:10] <nbd> maybe, maybe not
[22:11] <warrior520> what servers are you guys considering?
[22:11] <nbd> maybe oftcc
[22:11] <nbd> oftc
[22:23] <alxhh> ./topic be there: https://snr.freifunk.net/trac/wcc/wiki
[22:29] <exobyte> nbd: I noticed your web interface on a recent openwrt installation I did
[22:29] <exobyte> nifty
[22:32] <nbd> :)
[22:55] <godtvisken> 'm running in circles here.. I can't ping/ssh/get into the web interface of my WRT54G with OpenWRT running as a bridge, but it is working fine otherwise. I have successfully entered safe mode and I can access the router with telnet but when I run `passwd` and try to reset the password I get: "passwd: An error occurred updating the password file." So, I tried using the method described here, http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Installing/
[23:50] <godtvisken> How can I reset my WRT54G to factory firmware? This is my problem: http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=6585
[23:55] <surfatwork> would you mind just confirming whether the only way to get openwrt on a wgt634 is by compiling buildroot-ng from source?
[23:55] <surfatwork> please, thks. I'd like to try an image if ones avl. before compiling.
[23:55] <J4k3> nbd: its still working!!!
[23:55] <J4k3> 1 day 20 hours
[00:00] --- Sun Jul 23 2006
[00:16] <hobbs> "a genuine way" ?
[00:16] <Dabian> Well .. "preferred way" :9
[00:17] <common> iproute2
[00:17] <Dabian> I guess worst case, I could simply edit a file in /etc/init.d/
[00:17] <Dabian> add the commands.
[00:22] <Dabian> common : iproute2?
[00:22] <Dabian> hobbs: I guess there is no genuine/prefferred way?
[00:23] <Dabian> (Sorry for my bad english)
[00:26] <Dabian> Know any public relays or proxies or something I can use to "see myself from the outside" ?
[00:39] <Bartman007> Dabian: write your own shell script to do it.
[00:40] <hobbs> It would be nice if we could just use the usual ifupdown framework (with pre/post hooks and /e/n/interfaces) but of course I understand the preference for having that stuff in nvram :)
[00:42] <Bartman007> hobbs: White Russian will be inheriting the Kamikaze /etc/config/ style for configuration at some point in the future.
[00:43] <hobbs> Bartman007: I haven't used Kamikaze, but if you say it's a nicer setup, I'll believe you :)
[00:44] <hobbs> Bartman007: I'm used to OpenZaurus more than OpenWRT, and OZ is a highly debian-inspired system :)
[00:44] <h3sp4wn_> I think the kamikaze style is alot easier (as you don't have so much junk you don't need)
[00:44] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: Does oz use ipk or deb ?
[00:44] <hobbs> ipk
[00:45] <Bartman007> it matches a more standard linux way of doing things, /etc/config/network stores all of your if settings, similar to /etc/network/interfaces in debian.
[00:45] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: but ipkg is basically dpkg plus a few small features of apt-get and apt-cache :)
[00:45] <hobbs> and minor file format changes
[00:46] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: I know - but they are compressed with tar and gziped - instead of being compressed with ar
[00:46] <hobbs> right
[00:47] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: I was just wondering if it was based on embeddian debian which it seems not to be - thanks anyway
[00:47] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: no, it's not. Actually I think it's older than emdebian
[00:47] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: If I can get one for a good price I will get one
[00:48] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: it's got a certain amount in common with Familiar; they actually both use the same build system these days
[00:48] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: I just want a small terminal that I can connect to wifi with and use a keyboard
[00:48] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: depends what your idea of a good price is. They're expensive little toys
[00:49] <Kaloz> openzaurus was plain debian iirc with ipkg
[00:49] <Kaloz> and they later changed to uclibc, and got merged into familiar/handhelds.org stuff
[00:50] <hobbs> Kaloz: it's definitely a glibc system
[00:50] <Kaloz> still? i thought they switched to uclibc for a while now
[00:50] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: Not more than $200 (I lose / break things too frequently )
[00:51] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: Maybe more but not $600 or anything thats not worth it for me
[00:52] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: the C1k can be had for $350 new, you might find a C760 or something like that used for $250-300 if you look really hard
[00:53] <hobbs> the very oldest model, the SL-5500, you can get for $200 -- actually, I'll sell you one for $200 -- but it's got a tiny little bit of memory and hardware with no specs and can't keep up with newer stuff ;)
[00:53] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: Does the C1k have a hard disk ?
[00:53] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: no, the 3xxx models do
[00:54] <Dabian> Bartman007 : Thanks!
[00:54] <hobbs> h3sp4wn_: CF, SD, and USB OTG though
[00:54] <h3sp4wn_> hobbs: Its on my list of things to get if the price and time is right
[00:55] <hobbs> also CIA, FBI, and TLA.
[00:55] <h3sp4wn_> lol
[00:57] <Dabian> hobbs : Whats TLA? Some branch of RIAA?
[00:57] <hobbs> Dabian: Three Letter Acronym ;)
[00:58] <Dabian> hobbs :-D
[02:38] <denon> sigh, back in verizon 1x land
[02:39] <denon> a fate only J4k3 can understand
[02:42] <J4k3> I like 1x
[02:42] <J4k3> since its essentially free for me
[02:43] <J4k3> and I'd like to see a more stable network than freenode
[02:43] <J4k3> it sure as fuck isn't efnet
[02:44] <J4k3> efnet = unstable and chuck full of asshats
[02:44] <exobyte> oftc?
[02:44] <exobyte> but efnet is better for pr0n and other not so legal activities
[02:44] <J4k3> efnet isn't good for anything
[02:45] <exobyte> is freenode reall that unstable?
[02:46] <exobyte> *really
[02:48] <common> J4k3: are you on efnet?
[02:56] <Bartman007> exobyte: you haven't been around lately have you?
[02:56] <exobyte> not all that much
[02:57] <Bartman007> that's why you haven't seen any problems with freenode
[03:03] <xjjk> good evening
[03:03] <xjjk> AthlonRob: funny seeing you here...
[03:04] <xjjk> I'm wanting to use my AP as a wireless client in routed/bridge mode
[03:04] <xjjk> are there any CLI user-friendly clients
[03:04] <xjjk> for displaying wireless networks
[03:04] <xjjk> and connecting to them
[03:04] <h3sp4wn> J4k3: Are the gnaa running rampage over efnet ?
[03:04] <xjjk> iwlist is not the most userfriendly thing
[03:04] <Bartman007> h3sp4wn: I haven't had issues with them
[03:04] <xjjk> especially when many APs are available
[03:05] <xjjk> and I have to discern signal quality from strength and noise
[03:05] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: Do you use efnet alot ?
[03:05] <alxhh> wl scan; sleep 5; wl scanresults
[03:05] <Bartman007> h3sp4wn: yeah
[03:05] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: Right how can we sort out payment and delivery of this gateway ?
[03:06] <xjjk> alxhh: was that to me? what is wl?
[03:06] <xjjk> I don
[03:06] <xjjk> t have it on my AP...
[03:06] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: Or do you just want to wait until monday to send it ?
[03:07] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: (I am still not totally sure how much the insured postage is going to be)
[03:08] <Bartman007> you've got pm
[05:50] <godtvisken> Hey.. suddenly I can't access my router's status page, power cycling doesn't do anything. I can't even ping it, it never really times out, it just hangs trying to reach it
[05:52] <jakllsch> is it in the ARP table?
[05:52] <godtvisken> I know it's not a support channel, but no one replied to my post on the forum after 5 days so far..
[05:52] <godtvisken> jakllsch: I don't know, what's that?
[05:57] <godtvisk1n> jakllsch: yes, it is in the arp table
[05:57] <godtvisk1n> if you mean running `arp`
[06:01] <jakllsch> does ssh work?
[06:01] <godtvisk1n> no, that just hangs too
[06:03] <jakllsch> huh, dunno, does the serial console (if available) reveal anything?
[06:04] <jakllsch> also, have you tried failsafe?
[06:05] <godtvisken> no, i was going to try that next, just seeing if there were other options
[06:24] <godtvisken> I tried going into failsafe mode,
[06:25] <godtvisken> But I still couldn't access it,
[06:25] <godtvisken> even using the IP 192.168.1.1 which the OpenWRT docs say it defaults to in failsafe mode
[06:26] <Bartman007> heh, got my 7001 flashed, and it can't even load the kernel :-)
[06:27] <h3sp4wn> Much fun in store then
[06:30] <Bartman007> heh, now I can't reach my server from the 7001, yet I can reach my router...
[06:31] <h3sp4wn> Is the wireless working ?
[06:31] <h3sp4wn> but no ethernet ?
[06:31] <godtvisken> h3sp4wn: who are you talking to?
[06:32] <Bartman007> no, I'm in Redboot, the XScale equivalent of CFE.
[06:32] <h3sp4wn> Oh right - was talking to bartman
[06:33] <Bartman007> wtf, I only messed with the kernel and rootfs partitions
[06:35] <Bartman007> there is no reason I shouldn't be able to reach the server....
[06:38] <Bartman007> heh, rebooted and now it works right
[06:42] <Bartman007> lol, my kernel sure doesn't boot
[07:09] <denon> anyone know if wl0_txpwr is applicableon the asus dlx units?
[07:09] <denon> wl500dlx that is
[07:10] <Bartman007> ugh... neither http or tftp transfers work.
[07:10] <Bartman007> meaning my kernel doesn't work.
[07:43] <infectedRoot> i got a question for someone
[07:44] <warrior520> just ask
[07:44] <infectedRoot> i have a linksys wrt54g v5. ive found a bazillion links pointing to getting ddwrt on it, but not openwrt on it... how the hell can i get openwrt on this damned router. i hate ddwrt.
[07:45] <infectedRoot> ive found the bitsum link but it doesn't say how to get openwrt on the router
[07:45] <warrior520> have you been to the openwrt website?\
[07:45] <infectedRoot> yep
[07:46] <warrior520> did you read the documentation
[07:47] <godtvisken> infectedRoot: http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Hardware/Linksys/WRT54G and http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Installing
[07:47] <godtvisken> I have the same router and I used those sites
[07:47] <infectedRoot> yup
[07:48] <warrior520> so whats the problem then?
[07:48] <godtvisken> warrior520: I don't know, what /is/ the problem?
[07:48] <infectedRoot> well i try to get the firmware on and it doesn't work
[07:49] <godtvisken> Well what do you try to do?
[07:49] <warrior520> yeah man you need to be more descriptive because the docs are very good
[07:49] <infectedRoot> used the bitsum tutorial : http://www.bitsum.com/openwiking/owbase/ow.asp?WRT54G5%5FCFE
[07:49] <godtvisken> warrior520: er sorry, i thought you were the other guy when i said "what /is/ the problem?"
[07:49] <infectedRoot> but i only got ddwrt on there
[07:50] <godtvisken> infectedRoot: the second link I posted should be sufficient..
[07:50] <Bartman007> infectedRoot: let me save you time and energy. The v5's are crap. DD-wrt micro is the best you are going to be able to get on there
[07:51] <Bartman007> openwrt micro fits, but good luck installing any additional packages
[07:51] <godtvisken> anyways, does anyone know what's going on? I have an WRT54G v3 and I have OpenWRT successufully installed and I have accessed the status page before (and ssh'ed into it) but now all of a sudden I can't, I have tried to reboot it and go into failsafe. I can't get into failsafe though, the DMZ light flashes like it should, but I can't access 192.168.1.1
[07:51] <Bartman007> you have to build your own images to get anything to fit
[07:51] <godtvisken> the device works fine otherwise,
[07:51] <godtvisken> i have it set up as a bridge and i am online with it..
[07:52] <warrior520> godtvisken: its alright man, i know how it is
[07:52] <Bartman007> godtvisken: sometimes you have to clear your arp cache to see it in safe mode
[07:52] <godtvisken> Bartman007: how do i do that?
[07:52] <Bartman007> depends on your OS
[07:52] <warrior520> ohh shit you know what, I was outside, but I forgot all about that you said it was v5
[07:53] <warrior520> why did you buy a v5??
[07:55] <godtvisk1n> sorry, problems with my modem lately too. anyways, i last saw this if anyone said anything else:
[07:55] <godtvisk1n> 22:45 Bartman007> depends on your OS
[07:55] <godtvisk1n> 22:45 godtvisken> running debian
[07:56] <DarkDrgn2k> Hey, is itr true that a rev 5 can run openwrt (micro) or not
[07:56] <Bartman007> godtvisken: I think I'm actually thinking of other things, and it's not needed for failsafe...
[07:56] <Bartman007> DarkDrgn2k: yes it is true.
[07:57] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: the link in the main website links to a ddwrt solution, any one know of the open wrt solution
[07:57] <Bartman007> the OpenWRT micro image.
[07:58] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: yes how do u put that image on.. is there a special way
[07:58] <godtvisk1n> Bartman007: hm, so any other ideas?
[07:59] <Bartman007> DarkDrgn2k: if you've already loaded CFE onto the v5, just follow the installation instructions.
[07:59] <Bartman007> godtvisk1n: you're using a squashfs image?
[07:59] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: whats cfe?
[08:00] <synth> what's a squash??
[08:00] <DarkDrgn2k> Syncros: there are 2 versions of the file system
[08:00] <synth> heh.
[08:00] <Bartman007> wget a_aclue
[08:00] <godtvisk1n> synth: http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Installing#head-3d6480403b294d4c261f360ab9efc82f388a8790
[08:00] <DarkDrgn2k> Syncros: squashfs and jiffs...
[08:00] <synth> im being sarcastic :D
[08:00] <DarkDrgn2k> :-S
[08:00] <DarkDrgn2k> so whats "cfe"
[08:00] <godtvisk1n> Bartman007: yeah
[08:00] <godtvisk1n> Bartman007: yeah, using squash
[08:01] <synth> compact flash
[08:01] <Bartman007> godtvisk1n: then it should be working.
[08:01] <synth> eeeeesomething
[08:01] <DarkDrgn2k> ok well i dont get this comment: " if you've already loaded CFE onto the v5"
[08:01] <synth> yeah
[08:01] <Bartman007> synth: I would assume it's Common Firmware Environment
[08:02] <synth> Bartman007: ah, ok
[08:02] <synth> the boot prom
[08:02] <Bartman007> DarkDrgn2k: then you haven't read the bitsum guide enough...
[08:02] <DarkDrgn2k> so how do u load the cfe then?
[08:02] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: i did.. and bricked a wrt :-P
[08:02] <synth> that wonderful thingy that saves me when i screw my wrt
[08:02] <godtvisk1n> Bartman007: well.. it's not (: i mean, it is doing it's job, acting as a bridge, but i can't check it's status
[08:02] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: hance me supoer cautiouseness
[08:04] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: ok i managed to get ddwrt on the router, how can i swich it to openwrt?
[08:05] <Bartman007> read the openwrt install documentation.
[08:06] <Bartman007> godtvisk1n: you sure you have the correct ip?
[08:07] <godtvisk1n> Bartman007: well, when it goes into failsafe it should default to 192.168.1.1, right?
[08:08] <DarkDrgn2k> godtvisk1n: yes
[08:08] <Bartman007> you sure your computer has a 192.168.1.x address?
[08:08] <godtvisk1n> inet addr:192.168.1.103
[08:09] <godtvisk1n> Well, maybe the other router is interfering, because it runs at 192.168.1.1 by default.. but I have been into safemode and now I restarted the router again, shouldn't the settings have been earased?
[08:09] <godtvisk1n> so I shouldn't even be online
[08:10] <Bartman007> so your main (non-bridged) router runs as 192.168.1.1?
[08:10] <godtvisk1n> yeah
[08:11] <godtvisk1n> so I set my bridged one to run at 192.168.1.129
[08:11] <Bartman007> yeah... flush your arp cache... read up on how to do it.
[08:11] <godtvisk1n> ok
[08:19] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: you know what the firmware for the v5s are..
[08:19] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: i keep getting patter errors with openwrt-wrt54g-squashfs.bin
[08:22] <Bartman007> um... that's not the image you should be using... If you had read the notes on the dd-wrt website you would know that.
[08:24] <Bh420> duh
[08:24] <Bh420> :P
[08:25] <Bartman007> Bh420: that's not any help.
[08:29] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: ummm.. what image should i be using... i cant seem to find any ref of openwrt on bit's tutiraol
[08:30] <Bartman007> did you download the wrt54g image of dd-wrt micro?
[08:31] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: yez i managed to get dd-wrt working
[08:31] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: but i want to install openwrt
[08:31] <Bartman007> no you didn't download the wrt54g image
[08:31] <Bartman007> look at the file name
[08:32] <DarkDrgn2k> ??? openwrt-wrt54g
[08:32] <DarkDrgn2k> i didnt download the image.. wat?
[08:32] <Bartman007> you didn't download the *wrt54g* image of dd-wrt
[08:33] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: i want to install openwrt not dd-wrt
[08:33] <Bartman007> OpenWRT and DD-wrt work on more devices than just the Linksys WRT54G(S)
[08:33] Action: DarkDrgn2k thinks hes missing somethign
[08:33] <DarkDrgn2k> openwrt-wrt54g-squashfs.bin <- looks like wrt54g to me!!!
[08:33] <DarkDrgn2k> please tell me what im missing
[08:33] <Bartman007> openwrt != dd-wrt
[08:34] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: yes i know
[08:34] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: i want to isntall OPENWRT
[08:34] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: currently i have dd-wrt installed
[08:34] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: when i try to tftp the openwrt image it says invalid pattern (or w/e)
[08:34] <Bartman007> yes.
[08:34] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: so what am i doing wrong
[08:34] <Bartman007> you downloaded the *generic* image of dd-wrt
[08:35] <Bartman007> as such you should download the generic image of openwrt
[08:35] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: not the micro?
[08:35] <Bartman007> the wrt54g images for each have extra data at the begining so the wrt54g models (pre v5) will take them
[08:35] <Bartman007> yes, still use the micro images, but not the wrt54g images.
[08:35] <DarkDrgn2k> what other images are there...
[08:36] <DarkDrgn2k> there wrt54gs
[08:36] <DarkDrgn2k> wa840g
[08:36] <DarkDrgn2k> brcms.. i see no "generic"
[08:36] Action: DarkDrgn2k feels dumb right now
[08:36] <Bartman007> http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Installing#head-40b613e9790c8eaa414d75f77fe919c2ad371791
[08:37] <Bartman007> ok sorry, it doesn't explicitly say in the install guide that the bcrm images are generic device images
[08:37] <DarkDrgn2k> ooooo ok
[08:38] <Bartman007> pretty much your wrt54g v5 becomes a generic broadcom router when you flash the vxkiller file onto it.
[08:38] <DarkDrgn2k> THANK YOU so i need to use the brcm
[08:38] <Bartman007> that is why you have to use the generic dd-wrt image, and the bcrm openwrt images
[08:38] <DarkDrgn2k> gotcha
[08:38] <DarkDrgn2k> LOL no wonder nothign worked!
[08:38] Action: DarkDrgn2k udnerstands now
[08:39] <Bartman007> I was trying to get you to figure it out yourself, but I thought that the dd-wrt wiki and openwrt wiki had the needed information more readily available.
[08:39] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: i know what you where trinig to do but the brcm file being generic is what screwed me up (and brivcked a perfectly good router)
[08:40] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: you screw the boot loader so it doenst know its a wrt anymjore..
[08:41] <DarkDrgn2k> Bartman007: and some of those forums posts now start to make sence
[08:42] <DarkDrgn2k> " WARNING OpenWrt White Russian has no failsafe mode for JFFS2 firmware images.
[08:42] <DarkDrgn2k> what.. no "fail safe" mode ?!?!?
[08:43] <Bartman007> yes, http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Troubleshooting?highlight=%28failsafe%29
[08:45] <Bartman007> I'm off to bed, good luck.
[08:45] <DarkDrgn2k> thanx mate
[10:47] <nbd> .
[10:48] <[mbm]> ..
[11:57] <mic_> hi, do i need to install dropbear sshd daemon at first?
[12:23] <zamba> how can i force a reinitiate of a wds link?
[12:23] <zamba> wds link using wpa, that is
[12:32] <blop> zamba: reboot one of the AP =)
[12:33] <zamba> blop: it's enough just to do one of them, yeah?
[12:33] <zamba> because the other will be placed on a mountain top :)
[12:33] <zamba> so it's kind of hard to reboot it :)
[12:33] <zamba> unless you have a bazooka around
[12:33] <zamba> ok, nevermind rebooting :)
[12:33] <blop> i dont know well the process of wds linking , i cant tell :/
[12:34] <blop> but u can reboot a distant AP
[12:34] <blop> if u're sure it will come back alive :)
[12:34] <zamba> sure
[12:53] <mic_> question... wl0_auth_mode is set to open
[12:53] <mic_> do i need to unset this if i want to use WPA
[12:53] <mic_> and if yes, how can i do that
[12:54] <zamba> it's not used anymore
[12:54] <zamba> wl0_akm is used instead
[12:55] <zamba> and you set that to either open, wpa, psk, wpa2 or psk2
[12:55] <mic_> but wl0_auth_mode is there
[12:55] <zamba> well, it's not used
[12:55] <mic_> ok
[12:55] <zamba> do nvram unset wl0_auth_mode if it bothers you
[12:55] <mic_> so i have another issue
[12:55] <mic_> maybe a problem to use psk psk2
[12:56] <blop> [12:47:53] <mic_> but wl0_auth_mode is there => nvram unset wl0_auth_mode :) if its not used anymore u can unset it
[12:56] <blop> dam :) grilled :D
[12:56] <mic_> indeed
[12:56] <mic_> :)
[12:57] <mic_> however i cannot log on
[12:57] <mic_> maybe iBook doesn't work
[13:05] <mic_> are there any possibilities to analyze why it isn't possible to log-on the wlan?
[13:59] <sk2> Hi, I've just been handed a WRT54G v3 for which the root password has been lost. I am unable to ping it on 192.168.1.1 after I reset it, but I can get an ssh prompt on the 10.x range it was set to after it boots. If the DMZ light never comes on then I will have to short the flash chip to get into failsafe won't I?
[14:01] <sk2> what's weird is the power button is continually flashing
[14:06] <Ionic_NB> Hi, might anyone guide me through switching from WEP to WPA step by step? I want to be sure that everything was made right :/
[14:07] <mic_> there is guide on the wiki
[14:07] <mic_> which is NOT reachable
[14:07] <Ionic_NB> For setting up WPA, yes
[14:07] <Ionic_NB> But not for switching
[14:07] <mic_> where is the different between this?
[14:08] <sk2> ns
[14:09] <sk2> cant you just setup wpa?
[14:09] <Ionic_NB> mic_: I think I have to disable WEP first, don't I?
[14:09] <Ionic_NB> sk2: I tried yesterday but couldn't connect to the AP
[14:09] <Ionic_NB> Now, I want to be really sure the AP is working correctly
[14:10] <mic_> Ionic_NB: use the webfrontend....
[14:10] <Ionic_NB> Nah...
[14:10] <Ionic_NB> I don't know how it behaves since it's pivot_rooted and so on
[14:10] <sk2> why not?
[14:11] <mic_> i cannot get WPA working
[14:11] <mic_> but i think i know now why...
[14:12] <Ionic_NB> Mh
[14:13] <mic_> can anyone answer me
[14:13] <mic_> if WPA is not working, if the DHCP server is not reachable?
[14:13] <sk2> correct
[14:13] <mic_> indeed
[14:13] <sk2> seeing as you will have no dataflow...
[14:13] <mic_> then i have to now why isn't it reachable via wlan
[14:13] <sk2> huh?
[14:13] <mic_> my dhcp server is NOT on my wrt
[14:13] <mic_> i'm using a ipcop router
[14:14] <mic_> and the wrt just as a switch and an access-point
[14:14] <sk2> if WPA is screwed you will have no dataflow...
[14:15] <Ionic_NB> Mh
[14:15] <mic_> the questions is indeed
[14:15] <mic_> WHY the DHCP server is not reachable
[14:15] <mic_> for wlan
[14:15] <sk2> wtf
[14:15] <sk2> are you running WPA across the wifi link?
[14:16] <mic_> yes
[14:16] <mic_> but i couldn't log on
[14:16] <sk2> and is WPA working?
[14:16] <mic_> no it is not
[14:16] <mic_> no i have disabled authentication
[14:16] <sk2> then wtf are you asking about dhcp for?
[14:16] <mic_> my client get a connection but not an IP
[14:16] Action: sk2 sigh
[14:17] <mic_> the problem i don't know what is wrong
[14:17] <mic_> i reconfigured the vlans
[14:17] <sk2> do static ips work?
[14:17] <mic_> because i don't need the WAN interface
[14:17] <mic_> does WPA work with static ip's?
[14:18] <sk2> WPA doesnt give a shit about how your ips are assigned
[14:18] <sk2> basically
[14:18] <sk2> can you get dataflow across the wireless link?
[14:18] <mic_> is it possible to see that?
[14:18] <mic_> i couldn't find any log file
[14:18] <mic_> or anything like this to see what happen on the wrt
[14:19] <sk2> does stuff work across the wireless link?
[14:19] <mic_> if i disable wpa yes
[14:19] <sk2> how do you verify this?
[14:19] <mic_> i logged on
[14:19] <mic_> and give the client a static ip
[14:20] <mic_> i saw that the client doesn't got an IP from my dhcp server
[14:20] <sk2> can you ping with statically assigned ips?
[14:22] <mic_> indeed i cannot
[14:22] <mic_> "host is down"
[14:22] <sk2> ok
[14:22] <sk2> i'd say your wpa is fucked
[14:22] <sk2> forget the dhcp
[14:23] <mic_> well
[14:23] <mic_> my wpa is disabled
[14:23] <mic_> this was without encryption
[14:23] <sk2> checked ips/subnets?
[14:23] <mic_> yep
[14:24] <mic_> i think i made anything wrong reconfiguring vlans
[14:24] <mic_> and bridging lan and wifi
[14:31] <Ionic_NB> So... what am I supposed to do first? ifconfig eth1 down?
[14:34] <Ionic_NB> Mh I'll set the 3 nvram variables first
[14:38] <Ionic_NB> Btw, can I use whitespaces in my preshared key?
[14:52] <pablo> when i change the nvram directives, they dont change in the web interface
[14:52] <Ionic_NB> pablo: try nvram commit
[14:53] <pablo> wl0_closed=0 commit?
[14:55] <Ionic_NB> nvram commit
[14:56] <pablo> thanks
[14:59] <Ionic_NB> Is really no one in here who might help me switching from WEP to WPA? :(
[15:23] <Bartman007> jeez the efnet hub I'm n netsplit nearly 3 hours ago, and still hasn't rejoined the rest of the network
[15:24] <common> irc.efnet.nl
[15:24] <common> rocksolid
[15:28] <Bartman007> and over 6000 miles away.
[15:28] <Bartman007> I switched the the LA server, hopefully it is more stable than the SF server.
[15:29] <Bartman007> to the*
[15:36] <sk2> Is anyone here familiar with WRT54G v3?
[15:36] <sk2> I have one that the password has been forgotten for.
[15:37] <common> attach serial console
[15:37] <sk2> is that the only solution? If so I'll hand it back and tell him its his problem.
[15:38] <sk2> The DMZ light never lights.
[15:45] <Fonero> huhu
[15:47] <[mbm]> sk2: just boot the damned thing into failsafe :P
[15:50] <sk2> [mbm]: I can't ping the damn thing on 192.168.1.1 regardles... which is odd as I get the ssh prompt once it's loaded
[15:50] <sk2> ssh prompt on 10.something wacked he set
[15:51] <blop> Ydef? :)
[16:09] <sk2> so [mbm], if the thing won't repond to pings at 192.168.1.1, and reset button doesn't do anything, the only failsafe option I have is resetting flash/jtag isn't it?
[16:10] <Ionic_NB> Hmm... I set all variables in NVRAM that are used for WPA, what should I do now? I think it should still use WEP, shouldn't it?
[16:11] <Ionic_NB> Do I have to shut down the WLAN interface first and then start nas?
[16:33] <Ionic_NB> Am I really that annoying? :P
[16:35] <zamba> indeed
[16:35] <zamba> :)
[16:39] <Ionic_NB> I just don't know what to do :p
[16:55] <Ionic_NB> And still not working...
[17:16] <Ionic_NB> And as far as I can see in the WebIF the router is using WPA-PSK
[17:17] <ptobler> hey
[17:20] <ptobler> is there a way to implement port triggering on the white russian rc5?
[17:39] <Fonero> huhu
[17:52] <b_d_p> i can get anything up at the following pages: http://wiki.openwrt.org/TableOfHardware and http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Configuration the rest of the wiki is fine, can somebody check them?
[17:52] <b_d_p> same issue for a couple days
[18:02] <b_d_p> 200+ idlers huh?
[18:06] <zoo> sure
[18:11] <b_d_p> :)
[18:14] <ptobler> weird. i can'T connect from the wlan to any of the wired computers
[18:14] <ptobler> is that intended by openwrt?
[18:48] <denon> quiet place today
[19:18] <Bartman007> Kaloz: either my kernel image is bad, or I'm completely inept. I can successfully send the kernel and rootfs over, and commit them to flash, but I can't get past there. When attempting to load the kernel, it doesn't get past "Using base address 0x0001c400 and length 0x00100000" in the exec command (so its not running anything in the kernel.)
[19:29] <denon> anyone use iwlist for active scanning kinda stuff?
[19:29] <denon> it seems to kinda flake out if you scan too frequently
[19:41] <Stormy> What's the easist way to reset an openwrt install back to default values? WRT54G v2.
[19:41] <Stormy> i thought i read something about the switch in the back is not safe to use
[19:57] <twb> Is there a way to get dnsmasq to reread it's config file?
[19:59] <crazy_imp> twb: don't know, but one way is killall dnsmasq and restart it
[20:01] <common> kill -HUP
[20:07] <somedude_> Hi, i managed to get my openwrt ccpmmected to a bssid via "client" mode, but how do i cange teh fire to nat on the wifi connection not he ont eh wan port
[20:18] <twb> Thanks.
[20:28] <somedude_> how do you nat a connction again?
[20:29] <Bh420> rtfm
[20:29] <somedude_> Bh420: i been trying to ... dam old fms
[20:34] <lllegal> I'm having issues with pptp connection: after hour or two of fine web expwrience, suddenly packets stop traveling to server end of pptp connection. when i ping client ip at wrt end of tunnel I see icmp request and reply going back but not apearing at server side interface.. is this a known issue or bug, any ideas ?
[20:36] <somedude_> iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -o br0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
[20:36] <somedude_> iptables -A FORWARD -i br0 -o eth1 -j ACCEPT
[20:37] <somedude_> <--- any idea whast wrong
[20:38] <ed> somedude_: and what's the problem? ;p
[20:39] <ed> why are you using "br0" ?
[20:39] <lllegal> also the log is full of: Jul 22 21:31:19 (none) kern.warn pppd[672]: Protocol-Reject for unsupported protocol 0x5b14
[20:39] <ed> br0 is the bridge interface
[20:39] <ed> should never been used
[20:39] <ed> lllegal: unset mppe in your client, and set ms chap v2 as auth proto
[20:40] <somedude_> ed: not to screw with ethe nvram.. br0 is simply the lan internet - wifi
[20:40] <ed> no.
[20:40] <ed> it's the bridge, and that's all
[20:40] <ed> you should never use that interface as a real interface.
[20:40] <somedude_> so instead of br use eth0?
[20:40] <ed> no
[20:40] <ed> completely wrong
[20:40] <ed> use vlan*
[20:40] <ed> refers to doc.
[20:41] <somedude_> vlan0 is lan vlan1 is wan
[20:41] <somedude_> lol doh
[20:41] <ed> eth0 is an internal interface
[20:41] <ed> unusable
[20:41] <somedude_> ok
[20:41] <ed> -(20:33:57)- <somedude_> vlan0 is lan vlan1 is wan
[20:41] <ed> then...
[20:42] <somedude_> iptables -A FORWARD -i eth1 -o vlan0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
[20:42] <somedude_> iptables -A FORWARD -i vlan0 -o eth1 -j ACCEPT
[20:42] <somedude_> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth1 -j MASQUERADE
[20:42] <somedude_> iptables -A INPUT -i vlan0 -j ACCEPT
[20:42] <somedude_> iptables -A FORWARD -i vlan0 -j ACCEPT
[20:42] <ed> uh
[20:42] <ed> you want nat from lan => wifi ?
[20:43] <somedude_> yes\\
[20:43] <ed> -(20:35:06)- <somedude_> iptables -A FORWARD -i vlan0 -j ACCEPT
[20:43] <ed> uh
[20:43] <ed> ok
[20:43] <somedude_> i wish to nat the WIFI not the WAN port lol
[20:43] <ed> then, should be ok ?
[20:43] <ed> don't know what you wanna do
[20:43] <somedude_> but wait
[20:43] <somedude_> isnt vlan0 INCLUDE wifi?
[20:43] <ed> no
[20:43] <ed> wait
[20:43] <somedude_> right its br0:-P
[20:44] <ed> http://ed.zehome.com/?page=wrt54g << look the scheme
[20:44] <somedude_> i want to have a secure network, contected via wifi to the main tineret stream
[20:44] <Bartman007> somedude_: the default firewall rules are quite secure.
[20:44] <ed> firewall does not increase security
[20:44] <somedude_> Bartman007: yes.. for WAN
[20:45] <somedude_> Bartman007: but i want to connect to a netwqork on teh oether side of the house via WIFI
[20:45] <somedude_> Bartman007: have it on a seperate subnet, and nat into the lan
[20:45] <ed> you should *NEVER* consider only using a firewall if you want security.
[20:45] <somedude_> ed: psudo security
[20:45] <Bartman007> somedude_: search the openWRT wiki for client mode.
[20:45] <ed> no.
[20:45] <ed> 0 security
[20:45] <somedude_> ed: i dont want shit to get routed back basically.
[20:46] <ed> that's what's doing right now with your rules.
[20:46] <mic_> hi, when this site will be up again: http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Configuration
[20:46] <somedude_> ed
[20:46] <somedude_> ed: but it doesnt work
[20:46] <somedude_> Tracing route to 216.239.39.104 over a maximum of 30 hops
[20:46] <somedude_> 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.32.254
[20:46] <somedude_> 2 * * * Request timed out.
[20:46] <Bartman007> mic_: it is up.
[20:46] <somedude_> 254 is the default router
[20:46] <mic_> Bartman007: it's empty...
[20:46] <mic_> just a white page
[20:46] <lllegal> ed: this server accepts only mschapv2 and mppe anyway
[20:46] <Bartman007> mic_: not for me...
[20:47] <mic_> hm
[20:47] <lllegal> ed: I have refuse eap, pap, chap and mppe required,stateless,no40,no56 in options and I don't see what else could be done
[20:47] <ed> somedude_: I think you're doing the nat the wrong way.
[20:47] <ed> lllegal: disable mppc
[20:47] <somedude_> ed: what should i be doing then?
[20:47] <lllegal> hmm, had that in pre nvram style
[20:47] <ed> (nomppc if i remember correctly)
[20:47] <lllegal> must try
[20:47] <ed> somedude_: invert the nat.
[20:48] <ed> you want nat on eth1
[20:48] <ed> oop
[20:48] <ed> ss
[20:48] <ed> sorry
[20:48] <ed> yes well :)
[20:48] <Bartman007> somedude_: if you followed the steps in this guide: http://wiki.openwrt.org/ClientModeHowto you wouldn't have needed to butcher your firewall
[20:49] <ed> then
[20:49] <somedude_> Bartman007: will it NAT the WIFI interface ?
[20:49] <ed> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -i eth1 -o vlan1 -j MASQUERADE
[20:49] <ed> that's what you want
[20:49] <Bartman007> the WIFI interface would become your $WAN
[20:49] <ed> or vlan0 don't remember.
[20:49] <somedude_> Bartman007: but i dot wanan scew with the vram
[20:49] <ed> depends you'r config ;:p
[20:49] <ed> -'
[20:50] <somedude_> y vlan1?
[20:50] <somedude_> nm
[20:50] <Bartman007> somedude_: you have to change nvram variables no matter what, unless you choose not to use a lot of the framework the openWRT has setup to make your life easier.
[20:50] <ed> well, that's only network filtering, so ... not really related to openwrt
[20:51] <somedude_> Bartman007: yes.. but nvram cant get overwriten with a simple flash
[20:51] <ed> so, if you've some problems with filtering, then reports to the netfilter documentation
[20:51] <somedude_> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -i eth1 -o vlan1 -j MASQUERADE
[20:51] <somedude_> iptables v1.3.3: Can't use -i with POSTROUTING
[20:51] <ed> s/-i//g
[20:51] <Bartman007> somedude_: wth does that have to do with anything?
[20:52] <somedude_> <ed> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -i eth1 -o vlan1 -j MASQUERADE
[20:52] <ed> somedude_: well, i'm not perfect, and that's a " by earth " command line i gave you
[20:52] <ed> so
[20:52] <ed> now
[20:52] <somedude_> yes yes
[20:52] <ed> i've done a mistake, then, removes '-i eth1'.
[20:52] <somedude_> no -i
[20:52] <somedude_> sitll doesnt work :-S
[20:54] <ed> haha
[20:54] Action: somedude_ going crazy
[20:54] <ed> pv me your config man.
[20:54] <Bartman007> somedude_: why are you so paranoid about changing the nvram. nvram configuration is required for openWRT unless you are written shell scripts to duplicate functionality built-in openWRT.
[20:58] <somedude_> Bartman007: i cant re-set nvram defaults
[20:58] <Bartman007> somedude_: then save a copy of the output of `nvram show` somewhere.
[20:58] <landonf_> Anyone noted that the wr54g can't pull off anything near wirespeed? It's churning through CPU cycles in the interrupt handler, I'm getting barely 25 Mbps.
[20:59] <Bartman007> landonf_: is this wan-to-lan performance?
[20:59] <landonf_> Yep
[20:59] <Bartman007> the wrt can achieve wirespeed in lan-to-lan
[20:59] <landonf_> Since that's all in the switch, isn't it?
[20:59] <ed> landonf_: you'll get better performance with iptables disabled.
[20:59] <somedude_> Bartman007: fine lest try it your way
[21:00] <ed> landonf_: what's the size of the packets you're routing ?
[21:00] <Bartman007> pretty much, the wrt only has one physical ethernet port for wan and lan. this is hooked up to a 6 port switch, 1 port for the wrt, 1 for wan, and 4 for lan
[21:00] <ed> that's *VERY* important on little cpus ...
[21:00] <ed> more packets they are, slower it is !
[21:01] <ed> so routing tiny packets costs a lot more that routing big packets
[21:01] <ed> => bw impacted directly
[21:01] <Bartman007> since all wired traffic travels through eth0, the wrt has to tell it where to go using vlans. so the wrt has to modify each and every packet... 25Mbps is pretty typical for these little 200mhz mipsel processors
[21:01] <landonf_> Yeah, lots more interrupts. But in this case I'm generally pushing the full 1500 bytes.
[21:02] <landonf_> Bartman007: Fair enough. VLAN tagging for the slow.
[21:02] <Bartman007> landonf_: don't waste your time trying to acheive anything better. that's as good as you can get from a wrt54g
[21:03] <common> landonf_: if yoi have 25mbit inet connection you should spend little more money on a router than 50 bucks
[21:03] <landonf_> Is there hardware I'm going to see better from?
[21:04] <Bartman007> landonf_: a soekris or routerboard should provide better performance, but those require you to build your own kamikaze images
[21:04] <landonf_> hmm, was just looking at the soekris boards.
[21:04] <common> http://www.tomsnetworking.com/lans_routers/charts/index.html?chart=119
[21:04] <landonf_> common: Just my access point. I have a LAN ... :)
[21:04] <Bartman007> if you have an old computer, slap an additional nic in it, and install IPCop or pfSense, or any other router-oriented distro
[21:05] <common> landonf_: so you care about wifi <-> lan speed?
[21:05] <landonf_> Bartman007: Idea was basically to get rid of as many noisy PCs as possible at the new apartment
[21:05] <landonf_> common: Yep
[21:05] <Bartman007> landonf_: wait, you want higher than 25Mbps wlan perf?
[21:06] <common> 25mbit for wifi is pretty much
[21:06] <Bartman007> standard 11g won't get you any higher.
[21:06] <ed> landonf_: you should consider using a C7 processor
[21:06] <ed> or a C3 1Ghz processor
[21:06] <common> ed
[21:06] <mic_> question... why isn't it possible to get an IP from DHCP server in network after configuring the IP address of the openwrt via DHCP
[21:06] <common> does not change a diam on wifi
[21:06] <landonf_> Even with 54g?
[21:06] <common> even with 54g
[21:07] <landonf_> I mean, I assumed that 54 Mbits is a theoretical maximum, but 25 Mbits is the realistic maximum?
[21:07] <Bartman007> landonf_: without getting into it too much 54Mbps is the signalling speed, the overhead of wifi is quite large...
[21:07] <ed> common: i know that !
[21:07] <Bartman007> you will NEVER hit 54Mbps not even theoretical.
[21:07] <landonf_> Guess I didn't realize the overhead was that substantial.
[21:07] <landonf_> Well poop.
[21:08] <ed> 802.11 overhead, ethernet overhead, ip overhead, tcp overhead, then link quality !
[21:08] <landonf_> I've got a very difficult to wire apartment
[21:08] <ed> and layer 7 overhead
[21:08] <ed> landonf_: why not using 2 links with bonding ?
[21:08] <landonf_> ed: Sure, but 802.11 overhead would have to be pretty substantial to drop 54 Mbps to 25. But then, I guess there *is* link quality ...
[21:09] <somedude_> Bartman007: didnt evne give me a route to eth1's interface now
[21:10] <ed> landonf_: is the load of your router going up to 1.00 with 25Mbps of trafic ?
[21:10] <landonf_> yes. Which is what led me to believe it was a hardware limitation :)
[21:10] <ed> sure.
[21:10] <Bartman007> somedude_: unfortunately I can't troubleshoot it since it sounds like you have done some extensive modifications to your setup.
[21:10] <ed> the wrt have a tiny processor ;)
[21:11] <ed> landonf_: try disabling iptables :)
[21:11] <somedude_> Bartman007: nop made none, it was all in a ascript that once rebooted all the changes disapeared
[21:11] <somedude_> Bartman007: i got a recentrly flashed wrt,
[21:11] <ed> (don't compile netfilter in the kernel)
[21:11] <ed>
[21:11] <ed> going to eat bye
[21:11] <landonf_> Aww man. I was hoping to avoid recompiling things.
[21:11] <landonf_> Alas.
[21:11] <somedude_> Bartman007: and for some reason i dont have a vlan1 anymore.
[21:11] <Bartman007> somedude_: so you followed the guide for routed client mode?
[21:12] <somedude_> yep
[21:12] <somedude_> bunch of nvram commands
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set wl0_mode=sta # routed client
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set lan_ifnames="vlan0 eth1"
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set wan_ifname=vlan1
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set lan_ifname=br0
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set lan_ifnames=vlan0
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set wan_ifname=eth1
[21:12] <somedude_> only change is i did not do dhcp on wan but static
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set lan_ipaddr=192.168.2.1
[21:12] <somedude_> nvram set lan_proto=static
[21:13] <somedude_> oops nvram set lan_ipaddr=192.168.32.254
[21:13] <somedude_> nvram set wan_ipaddr=192.168.0.254
[21:13] <somedude_> nvram set wan_proto=static
[21:13] <somedude_> ooo no default ..
[21:13] <lllegall> landonf_: I thought 16-19Mbit/s was max with 802.11g, afterburner ?
[21:14] <mic_> if i set lan_proto to dhcp
[21:14] <mic_> it is not possible for wlan clients to get an IP from DHCP serer
[21:14] <mic_> but why??
[21:14] <landonf_> lllegall: Doesn't seem to be the case, as I'm pushing 25 Mbps, WAN to LAN.
[21:14] <lllegall> right
[21:14] <Bartman007> mic_: lan_proto is the wrt what it should set it's lan ip address to.
[21:14] <lllegall> I thought wifi to wifi
[21:15] <mic_> Bartman007: but it is possible to use DHCP???
[21:15] <Bartman007> lllegall: I hit around 18-19Mbps wifi performance myself
[21:15] <Bartman007> mic_: for what? be more descriptive.
[21:15] <mic_> Bartman007: i have an ipcop router on my network, which act as a dhcp server
[21:16] <mic_> all clients should get their ip from this ipcop router
[21:16] <Bartman007> and how is the wrt connected to that?
[21:16] <mic_> normal lan port
[21:17] <Bartman007> then you should diable the wrt's dhcp server
[21:17] <mic_> is it still active at default?
[21:17] <Bartman007> unless you tell it otherwise, yes.
[21:17] <mic_> hmm
[21:17] <mic_> strange strange
[21:18] <mic_> because clients connected to the LAN ports of WRT
[21:18] <mic_> get their ip from my ipcop
[21:18] <mic_> just the wlan clients don't get
[21:18] <landonf_> heh. Wonder how bad ethernet over power is.
[21:18] <landonf_> Netgear claims 85 Mbps on their product.
[21:19] <tojoe> landonf_ i never got more than 8 mbit on that stuff
[21:19] <Bartman007> landonf_: they use Atheros's SuperG which uses multiple channels and proprietary tech.
[21:21] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: Have you got superg working yet ? I have looked at the spec sheet but never managed to find a channel its aloud to work on
[21:21] <Bartman007> IIRC superg only works on channel 6.
[21:21] <mic_> Bartman007: dnsmasq is the the dhcp server, isn't it?
[21:22] <Bartman007> but I have never tried testing it. only SuperG capable client card I have is a cardbus card I only use for PenTesting
[21:22] <Bartman007> mic_: yes
[21:22] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: That is what I thought but there is a spec sheet from madwifi that lists many different channels it can work on (When countrycode is set to different values there is various mhz settings it can work on)
[21:22] <Bartman007> h3sp4wn: maybe, I heard the channel 6 thing at some point in here. I've never used it myself.
[21:23] <mic_> so i have to delete the symlink in /etc/init.d
[21:23] <mic_> ...
[21:23] <Bartman007> I do plan on using SuperA with my 7001 once I get everything up :-)
[21:23] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: Its all the default netgear firmware can use but I have my doubts as to whether its working at all with madwifi at the moment
[21:24] <h3sp4wn> Bartman007: Or maybe I just can't understand the spec sheet and how to convert it into anything I can put into the router
[21:27] <landonf> join #quagga
[21:27] <landonf> woops
[21:29] <Bejgli> wrt!!
[21:35] <mic_> hm hm
[21:35] <mic_> missconfigured IP
[21:35] <mic_> if i try to use tftp it will not work, but i could see in ping that the router react
[21:35] <mic_> any ideas how to reset the router?
[21:40] <Bejgli> press the button on the back
[21:41] <mic_> as i read this doesn't work
[21:41] <mic_> hmm
[21:41] <mic_> i'll try
[21:50] <blop> what's that topic about ?
[21:51] <blop> freenode isnt good enough ?
[21:57] <surfatwork> discovered openwrt a couple of weeks ago...
[21:58] <surfatwork> thought I'd find some help here on getting a kamikaze image for the wgt634u
[21:58] <surfatwork> i am ok with linux, have the bits for a serial cable
[21:59] <surfatwork> and btw, I am in favor of movin to a more stable network...
[21:59] <J4k3> ...
[21:59] <surfatwork> i am not able to access flyashi's site, hence came here
[22:02] <surfatwork> Ydef: I'd appreciate it if I could get a username/pwd so I can atleast download from klasseonline
[22:09] Action: nbd removes the wiki reference to flyashi's site...
[22:10] <warrior520> I am also wondering about the topic, is this channel going to move to another server?
[22:10] <nbd> maybe, maybe not
[22:11] <warrior520> what servers are you guys considering?
[22:11] <nbd> maybe oftcc
[22:11] <nbd> oftc
[22:23] <alxhh> ./topic be there: https://snr.freifunk.net/trac/wcc/wiki
[22:29] <exobyte> nbd: I noticed your web interface on a recent openwrt installation I did
[22:29] <exobyte> nifty
[22:32] <nbd> :)
[22:55] <godtvisken> 'm running in circles here.. I can't ping/ssh/get into the web interface of my WRT54G with OpenWRT running as a bridge, but it is working fine otherwise. I have successfully entered safe mode and I can access the router with telnet but when I run `passwd` and try to reset the password I get: "passwd: An error occurred updating the password file." So, I tried using the method described here, http://wiki.openwrt.org/OpenWrtDocs/Installing/
[23:50] <godtvisken> How can I reset my WRT54G to factory firmware? This is my problem: http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?id=6585
[23:55] <surfatwork> would you mind just confirming whether the only way to get openwrt on a wgt634 is by compiling buildroot-ng from source?
[23:55] <surfatwork> please, thks. I'd like to try an image if ones avl. before compiling.
[23:55] <J4k3> nbd: its still working!!!
[23:55] <J4k3> 1 day 20 hours
[00:00] --- Sun Jul 23 2006