[22:43] <frop> maybe some extra functionality in the top level makefile: can buildroot-ng create a "list" file for ImageBuilder for current image?
[22:44] <Kaloz> malbon: syn
[22:44] <Kaloz> malbon: statusbar
[22:44] <malbon> ?
[22:44] <[mbm]> malbon: I think he wants you to look at your privatemsg's
[22:45] <Kaloz> actually i cna msg as well :p
[22:50] <malbon> brb
[22:54] <[mbm]> well.. this is cute .. "rmmod fuse" = segfault
[22:57] <CIA-16> nbd * r3873 /branches/buildroot-ng/openwrt/package/busybox/Makefile: remove weird /lib64 directory
[22:58] <CIA-16> nbd * r3874 /branches/buildroot-ng/openwrt/ (package/Makefile rules.mk): add support for parallel build of packages (tested with -j8)
[22:58] <nbd_> [mbm]: have fun :)
[23:04] <Kaloz> smp whoring
[23:04] <[mbm]> :)
[23:04] <Kaloz> we really need to get a sun t2000 for the site and svn and a sun t1000 for building :P
[23:05] <[mbm]> cluster of distcc's does nicely
[23:05] <nbd_> someone with a real smp machine should test how well the toolchain builds with some added -j$(CONFIG_JLEVEL)
[23:05] <Kaloz> (that would mean 32 cpus, 10K bogomips or so)
[23:10] <wigyori> nbd: 2 opteron 275's would do the job? (4x2.2gig)
[23:10] <nbd> sure
[23:10] <wigyori> k
[23:10] <nbd> for the toolchain build add the above flags to the $(MAKE) invocations in binutils/ and gcc/
[23:10] <[mbm]> Kaloz: hmm my ass is lagged .. is it the local connection or is openwrt.org slow?
[23:11] <Kaloz> try to traceroute
[23:12] <nbd> the connection is fast for me
[23:12] <[mbm]> hmm probably here .. the office connection gets overladed easily
[23:14] <Kaloz> 99% of the time the overload is nothing more then a "few" "funny" chainletters :P
[23:15] <[mbm]> eww, I'm loosing 80ms just on bounce across town
[23:15] <[mbm]> making it almost 300ms to openwrt.org
[23:16] <nbd> btw. olli replaced the text of all his posts in the dd-wrt forum with 'please remove'
[23:16] <Kaloz> lol?
[23:16] <[mbm]> lmao
[23:16] <Kaloz> i have no idea what happened to that guy
[23:16] <nbd> he could have used the delete button ....
[23:16] <nbd> :)
[23:16] <[mbm]> Kaloz: I'm guessing he's suddnely on wbx's new firmware
[23:16] <Kaloz> :DD
[23:17] <Kaloz> [mbm]: yeah, i guess
[23:17] <Kaloz> [mbm]: which is currently only different with the banner at all, if he even changed that yet
[23:18] <[mbm]> as much as wbx is right, I can't help but just laugh at the whole thing
[23:18] <nbd> same here
[23:21] <[mbm]> wow.. sendmail actually got pulled from netbsd
[23:33] <wigyori> nbd: http://pastebin.com/749963
[23:34] <nbd> hmm... too bad
[23:34] <alxhh> got the same
[23:34] Action: [mbm] was just seconds away from posting a similar error
[23:35] <Kaloz> imho the toolchain has to be compiled with -j1
[23:35] <[mbm]> think so .. only question I have left is if the packages are now being built in parallel
[23:35] <nbd> can binutils be parallelized?
[23:36] <nbd> at the moment it builds several packages at once, but the packages themselves are built with -j1
[23:36] <nbd> so the package stuff should be safe
[23:36] <wigyori> binutils compiled fine
[23:38] <nbd> btw. you could try to compile the final gcc in parallel
[23:49] <wigyori> aham, just a sec
[23:50] Action: [mbm] trying a buildroot-ng parallel build on a few xeons
[23:57] <wigyori> hmz, something else is wrong here, initial gcc-3.4.4 doesn't compile with singlethread also
[23:58] <[mbm]> I can confirm the gcc 3.4.4 compile issues
[23:59] <nbd> that's weird
[00:00] --- Thu Jun 1 2006
[22:44] <Kaloz> malbon: syn
[22:44] <Kaloz> malbon: statusbar
[22:44] <malbon> ?
[22:44] <[mbm]> malbon: I think he wants you to look at your privatemsg's
[22:45] <Kaloz> actually i cna msg as well :p
[22:50] <malbon> brb
[22:54] <[mbm]> well.. this is cute .. "rmmod fuse" = segfault
[22:57] <CIA-16> nbd * r3873 /branches/buildroot-ng/openwrt/package/busybox/Makefile: remove weird /lib64 directory
[22:58] <CIA-16> nbd * r3874 /branches/buildroot-ng/openwrt/ (package/Makefile rules.mk): add support for parallel build of packages (tested with -j8)
[22:58] <nbd_> [mbm]: have fun :)
[23:04] <Kaloz> smp whoring
[23:04] <[mbm]> :)
[23:04] <Kaloz> we really need to get a sun t2000 for the site and svn and a sun t1000 for building :P
[23:05] <[mbm]> cluster of distcc's does nicely
[23:05] <nbd_> someone with a real smp machine should test how well the toolchain builds with some added -j$(CONFIG_JLEVEL)
[23:05] <Kaloz> (that would mean 32 cpus, 10K bogomips or so)
[23:10] <wigyori> nbd: 2 opteron 275's would do the job? (4x2.2gig)
[23:10] <nbd> sure
[23:10] <wigyori> k
[23:10] <nbd> for the toolchain build add the above flags to the $(MAKE) invocations in binutils/ and gcc/
[23:10] <[mbm]> Kaloz: hmm my ass is lagged .. is it the local connection or is openwrt.org slow?
[23:11] <Kaloz> try to traceroute
[23:12] <nbd> the connection is fast for me
[23:12] <[mbm]> hmm probably here .. the office connection gets overladed easily
[23:14] <Kaloz> 99% of the time the overload is nothing more then a "few" "funny" chainletters :P
[23:15] <[mbm]> eww, I'm loosing 80ms just on bounce across town
[23:15] <[mbm]> making it almost 300ms to openwrt.org
[23:16] <nbd> btw. olli replaced the text of all his posts in the dd-wrt forum with 'please remove'
[23:16] <Kaloz> lol?
[23:16] <[mbm]> lmao
[23:16] <Kaloz> i have no idea what happened to that guy
[23:16] <nbd> he could have used the delete button ....
[23:16] <nbd> :)
[23:16] <[mbm]> Kaloz: I'm guessing he's suddnely on wbx's new firmware
[23:16] <Kaloz> :DD
[23:17] <Kaloz> [mbm]: yeah, i guess
[23:17] <Kaloz> [mbm]: which is currently only different with the banner at all, if he even changed that yet
[23:18] <[mbm]> as much as wbx is right, I can't help but just laugh at the whole thing
[23:18] <nbd> same here
[23:21] <[mbm]> wow.. sendmail actually got pulled from netbsd
[23:33] <wigyori> nbd: http://pastebin.com/749963
[23:34] <nbd> hmm... too bad
[23:34] <alxhh> got the same
[23:34] Action: [mbm] was just seconds away from posting a similar error
[23:35] <Kaloz> imho the toolchain has to be compiled with -j1
[23:35] <[mbm]> think so .. only question I have left is if the packages are now being built in parallel
[23:35] <nbd> can binutils be parallelized?
[23:36] <nbd> at the moment it builds several packages at once, but the packages themselves are built with -j1
[23:36] <nbd> so the package stuff should be safe
[23:36] <wigyori> binutils compiled fine
[23:38] <nbd> btw. you could try to compile the final gcc in parallel
[23:49] <wigyori> aham, just a sec
[23:50] Action: [mbm] trying a buildroot-ng parallel build on a few xeons
[23:57] <wigyori> hmz, something else is wrong here, initial gcc-3.4.4 doesn't compile with singlethread also
[23:58] <[mbm]> I can confirm the gcc 3.4.4 compile issues
[23:59] <nbd> that's weird
[00:00] --- Thu Jun 1 2006